The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Issue910.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This document looks useless. I'm not sure what the text says, but it doesn't look like the uploader's thesis, so it might be a copyvio. Stefan2 (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escudo-TdeA.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escudo-TdeA.jpeg. Stefan2 (talk) 01:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Innerstrength2.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Very low quality, so hard to see anything. Besides, if you do manage to read anything, you will see that the text on the image tells that the image is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Temporary keep. It is soley being used in a current discussion about the copyright date of a book. After the matter is settled, I'll ask for a speedy delete myself. The book itself (ie the copyrighted material) is not reproduced in anyway. The only thing the photo depicts is the copyright page.Niteshift36 (talk) 01:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clark LeClair Stadium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to have been taken from [1] or [2] - unable to determine original source, but both are identical to this image Skier Dude (talk) 03:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Web resolution, professional style. Uploader has said that I will admit, during my younger Wikipedia days, that I added pictures that I did not take. This 2006 image is certainly one that fits the bill. See also Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate.--GrapedApe (talk) 05:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arla Aston Clinton.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• no source for base map, therefore not possible to determine the actual (c) status of image Skier Dude (talk) 05:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Akko Lighthouse 1949.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This file is only in the public domain in the United States if it entered the public domain in Israel prior to 1996. This image can only be kept if it is also in the public domain in the US" but this image entered PD in 1999 (50 years after 1949) Bulwersator (talk) 12:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The file information page states that photos from "national image collections" have been released to the public domain, with he:File:Osef Hatazlumim.PNG. There is no confirmation that this really comes from a "national image collection" (unless it is stated in the Hebrew PNG file which I can't read), but if it does come from such collections might be treated as a special case of ((PD-release)) if I interpret the Canadian crown copyright discussion at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/All files copyrighted in the US under the URAA correctly. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tecnológico-de-Antioquia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tecnológico-de-Antioquia.jpeg. Stefan2 (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samawa football team.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doubt this is uploader-created work, or that xe holds the relevant rights to it. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samawa riverside.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a scan, work possibly not created/rights owned by the uploader. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:An Artistic Yoga class.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• According to TinEye, this was once on the companys website and another unrelated site - while uploader claims to be the creator, this would need to be verified through OTRS. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:27, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bharat Thakur with a student.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• According to TinEye, this was once on the companys website - while uploader claims to be the creator, this would need to be verified through OTRS. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bharat Thakur.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High-quality promo photo, judging by the other apparent violations by the uploader, I would not be surprised if they did not create this work/own the rights to release it under such a license. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:29, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:BT workshop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a corporate/promotional photograph (was uploaded for the purposes of being used in an article now deleted through Afd for being too promotional. All other uploads by the user have been nominated at PUF for being of dubious copyright status, so I wouldn't be surprised if this one has similar issues. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 17:32, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pseudointellectual.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image is made of up an original image (which was copyrighted - look on the image) and has no encyclopedic value. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juarez CIMG8464.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Donated to the City of Houston", so probably placed there when the photo was taken. The bust is dated 1985, so the photo is only allowed here "if tangible copies of the work have been sold to the public" before 1 March 1989 without copyright notice and without subsequent registration at the US Copyright Office within five years. There is no proof that this is the case. Stefan2 (talk) 18:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The comments made by the uploader state that - a) they have obtained permission from the holder to use it - this does not mean that he gave permission for it to be released into the public domain and b) there is no evidence of permission qualified through OTRS, uploaders should follow the guidance at DCM to ensure compliance. Therefore, this photo is possibly not in the public domain. Acather96 (talk) 19:33, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note that there are two very different files under the same name. The person uploading the latest one (claiming permission) didn't edit the file information page, so the licensing of the latest image is unknown, except that permission is claimed. The public domain statement applies to the older file. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:JaxNatlCemeterySite.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The majority of the picture is a map, which is probably under copyright. The Haz _talk 20:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Photo is released under CC0. Map is work by National Cemetery, which is PD as US-Gov.--GrapedApe (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Garam Masala.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyrighted packaging? If kept, it should be renamed since it currently blocks a Commons image. Stefan2 (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lua Lua.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned image looks like it could be copyvio. The source site listed is copyrights all of their images, though I could not find this exact one. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geraniums By Tucker.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Painter died in 1968, copyright should expire in 2038  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:25, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• 2039, not 2038. But are you sure that it wasn't published at some point before the end of 2002? If so, it might be copyrighted until 2073 in the worst case. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:51, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.