The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:JeremyLin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image uploaded on flickr has the logo of the Chinese webportal Sina in lower left corner. I believe this is originally a copyrighted image. Neuyyar (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:57, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lions XII Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unfree file with no article usage. Description page blanked by author. ScottSteiner ✍ 15:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep In use. I re-added the deleted things from the article page, requested deletion on Commons and requested resizing here. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:113px-RLballOrangeBlack.svg.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Based on the file name, this is a PNG version of an SVG file, but the SVG file isn't sourced, so I suppose that this means that the PNG file is improperly sourced. If the source SVG file is located, the PNG file should be deleted as redundant, since these kinds of images are supposed to be stored as SVG. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I looked threw the "Sources" uploadeds (see File list]: User:Crico). The image dose not appear anywhere, so Stefan2 is correct. However, I am not very familiar with the threshold where ((PD-shape)) comes into play. If this image qualifies, it wouldn't matter who created it, since no matter what it would be Public Domain, so the source could be changed to "Unknown". However, again, I'm not very familiar with the threshold, so I will leave it to others to decided if it should be kept.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 13:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G12 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan Liljenquist.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I find it highly improbable that the uploader owns copyright of this image as it appears to be a professional photo, image has no meta data, and uploader has only uploaded this image (suspect single purpose account). As a living person, all images must be PD or they have to be deleted. --ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 22:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.