The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Welagedara statue.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Statue in Sri Lanka, a country with no freedom of panorama. No indication of when statue was created, or when (or if) its creator died. Does not look like an old statue, and copyright in Sri Lanka is 70 years after the author's death. Closeapple (talk) 05:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Singaporespritebottles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• derivative of copyrighted packaging + unused, low quality file Bulwersator (talk) 08:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dietcokelemonlime.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• derivative of copyrighted packaging + unused, low quality file Bulwersator (talk) 08:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Australiaspriteicebottle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• derivative of copyrighted packaging + unused, low quality file Bulwersator (talk) 08:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thums Up.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• derivative of copyrighted packaging Bulwersator (talk) 08:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Montifurchi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• derivative of copyrighted packaging + unused, low quality file Bulwersator (talk) 08:16, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vblock 300 FX.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this really own work by the uploader? The same Flickr user has files which are obviously not own work, e.g. Google maps and newspaper articles, all listed as CC-BY-SA. This looks like a scan of some unidentified document, given the strange border. Stefan2 (talk) 09:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes. The Vblock image in question is made available as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license and, further, I am the creator of the image and my original publication is on Flickr at the following URL http://www.flickr.com/photos/jcuthrell/6341927952 which you can compare against my own user page and bio. The border is from the use of an Instagram filter. As I am the creator of the original image I am also able to send a permissions email to OTRS if needed but my hope was that selecting Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license within Flickr was suitable and, more importantly, sufficient. --Qthrul (talk) 10:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:DumboRideDisneyland1970s.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama in the United States. This is an artwork, isn't it? Stefan2 (talk) 09:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cassini-Huygens Template Header.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File without real, verifiable source. Bulwersator (talk) 09:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The uploader has a lot of other similar headers. It seems that they made it themselves using PD NASA images. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:47, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for information - see Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2012_August_30#File:Voyager_1_Template_Header.jpg and below. Bulwersator (talk) 22:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Without any sources, it's impossible to verify that all of these images were actually created by NASA or JPL. — ξ^xplicit 22:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schiaffino Milan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is dead. No evidence of publication which is required for PD-US. Stefan2 (talk) 10:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mrs. Johnny J. Jones.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It says that the unknown photographer has released this to the public domain. However, no source is given for this claim. The unknown photographer needs to follow the instructions at WP:CONSENT to prove this. Might be PD because of age, but insufficient information to prove this. Stefan2 (talk) 10:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:HeadAuto2009FutureBreed.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I can't find this at the Flickr URL. In any case, the Flickr uploader seems to have uploaded everything as CC-BY-NC-SA. Stefan2 (talk) 11:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Redhead Teenager.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• A Google Image search-by-image shows many copies of the same gallery of this 2010 event (the Dutch "Redhead Day"), which all include this picture. No clear evidence that the uploader is also the original photographer. McGeddon (talk) 12:30, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MilasGumuskesen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to forum Bulwersator (talk) 13:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:KemeraltiKartpostal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No evidence that it was published prior to January 1, 1923 Bulwersator (talk) 13:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:MGRPtomb132.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Higher resolution copy here. Stefan2 (talk) 13:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wasim Mogal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The file name suggests that this is a photo of the uploader. Thus, I question the present claim that this is a photo by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Auberge of the Flowering Hearth.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of a book. There is also a completely different image in the history. I believe that the CCI template refers to that other image. Stefan2 (talk) 13:47, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:PlumpWifeacp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Original work may be still copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F6 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:South African Army Badge.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ((PD-ineligible)). Stefan2 (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is actually an official logo, so the usual fair use rational for official logos would be correct. Roger (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The correct licencing for this image is ((Non-free symbol)). Can I simply change it or does this process here need to be concluded first? Roger (talk) 07:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All present use fails WP:NFCC#8, so the image isn't suitable as fair use, but I suppose that should be taken care of elsewhere. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:27, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, now licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 22:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SA Navy Badge.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not ((PD-ineligible)). Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is actually an official logo, so the usual fair use rational for official logos would be correct. Roger (talk) 14:49, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The correct licencing for this image is ((Non-free symbol)). Can I simply change it or does this process here need to be concluded first? Roger (talk) 07:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 18:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josefina Balderas Madrid.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photographed portrait may be still copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AtBulwersator (talk):

This File was personally created by me from my personal collection of Family memoirs, and I freely release it in public domain. If you have any questions regarding the free use of this file, please post it in my talk page. Thank you.--Sulbud (talk) 09:22, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:World Heritage Site division map.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• It seems that someone moved the file information page but that the file is still here. The page File:World Heritage Site division map.png might be the file information page for this file. In that case, the licence is that the map is ineligible for copyright. I don't agree; someone drew the map outlines, and maps are definitely copyrightable. Also, the map is unsourced. Stefan2 (talk) 15:12, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've merged the file and the description page history at File:World Heritage Site division map.png, and reopened this so discussion of the possible non-freeness of the image may continue. Anomie⚔ 21:11, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gregoriocortez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "Author: Unknown" and "I, the copyright holder of this work"? Something is strange here. Bulwersator (talk) 15:21, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wayhouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "circa 1910's" + "self-made". Sorry but I am suspicious. Bulwersator (talk) 15:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:UK Greece solidarity.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphan image was uploaded by now-blocked user. Includes a logo, possibly unfree due to that. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 17:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Simontreves.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• described as "self-portrait" by somebody claiming to be Simon Treves and as "photograph by Rano Vrijeme" Bulwersator (talk) 19:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ISS lights on.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is no proof that it is work of NASA, it may be created by Russian cosmonaut. File is unused. Bulwersator (talk) 20:14, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quassar727MEX.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• PD claim clearly inaccurate, and I am seeing no reason to assume that this is freely licensed. J Milburn (talk) 21:50, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rodrick Heffley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Character from a novel. This is not freely licensed. J Milburn (talk) 21:52, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank Heffley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Character from a novel. This is not freely licensed. J Milburn (talk) 21:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rosica.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image metadata suggests that the copyright belongs to Joshua Lanzarini. J Milburn (talk) 22:03, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • It also says "public domain" which contradicts with the Creative Commons licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.