The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, with all concerns addressed. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:13, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reverse jet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a textbook scan. Upload was in 2006, and it's claimed (as often happened bacck then) that it's "own work". The likelihood is that the uploader (now inactive) was merely the scanner, not the licence holder.

Note also that there are several similar images in use on Dust collector, and it's likely that they all stand or fall together.

Andy Dingley (talk) 11:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this is public domain as it was published by U.S. gov (OSHA) at [1]. - R. S. Shaw (talk) 06:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've re-tagged all those affected. I think this can be closed now as a keep. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:13, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minyor Stadium.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Obvious copyvio uploader, the rest of his uploads were deleted because of copyvio. User:B left him a message[2] on 14 February but he ignored it and later I found that File:Lokomotiv Stadium (Plovdiv).jpg was also a copyvio. Oleola (talk) 13:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kochistadiuminside.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• File uploaded without my permission as I had took this photo, ready to provide the original resolution of this photo to prove my ownership Darkbrow017 (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00599.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Tagged as being under the GFDL and cc-by 3.0/2.5 - though the description states the file is under cc-by-nc 3.0 US. Acather96 (talk) 19:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - uploader appears to have chosen the wrong license during upload process, and clearly intended the nc version. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PassWord Strength.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Procedural nomination: declined speedy. This is a screenshots of gmail, however the given screen shows sufficiently little creativity that I think it may qualify as ((PD-ineligible)). I am officially neutral. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep this PD-ineligible. There is no creativity there at all. --MGA73 (talk) 18:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.