The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Calmer Waters (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:KOIN6 Logo 2011.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• More than just a logo this appears to be a screen shot and would need an explicit fair use rationale; WP:NFR. Fæ (talk) 09:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miltondarkroom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miltondarkroom.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC01009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• While claimed PD-self, a different author is given and a URL to photobucket. Two TinEye results as well. Acather96 (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I've no idea about copyright status or TinyEye (?), but the author is essentially the same; Bob P and Robert Paley are more than likely interchangeable. Bob = Robert, etc. Brad78 (talk) 08:35, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabrosura Muevete.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Poster, doubt self-gfdl claim, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Master chief lol lol lol.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image of a Halo character, doubt self-cc-by/gfdl claim. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PlayerModel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image of a Halo character, doubt self-cc-by/gfdl claim. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 18:11, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pokemon.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Multiple images of Pokemon characters, doubt self-cc-by/gfdl claim. Only used in userspace. Acather96 (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture575.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Drawing/Art, doubt self-cc-by/gfdl claim. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 18:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as copyvio. Is in fact box art for a toy according to TinEye. Sven Manguard Wha? 22:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toronto-35767.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• While claimed PD-self, the description reads:

"i thought this is a nice pic of toronto. a guy on the talk page recommended it." This implies that the user found the picture elsewhere, and was it was suggested by another user to upload it - i.e not actually his own work. Not too sure about this one, a second opinion would be appreciated. Uploading user has a history of copy-vios, also orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.