The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allan Manning's Family.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a professional shot. Eeekster (talk) 01:15, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• I am the copyright holder of this picture. This was taken by a professional camera, for the use of Allan Manning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maduniw (talk • contribs) 23:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Danger (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:04, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakib (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The source "Own work/Camera by Gramen Films" appears to contradict itself. Eeekster (talk) 03:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • From the persons facebook (http://www.facebook.com/1shakibkhan, July 4) or mzamin.com also of July 4, 2011. --Martin H. (talk) 08:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 06:13, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Stadionul drobeta.jpg
• File:2010 04 19-poli-cfr04.jpg
• File:2009 11 23-poli-dinamo2-0-05.jpg
• File:2009-2010-poli-steaua20.jpg
• File:2008-2009-pandurii-poli0-1-06~0.jpg
• File:Flares at Romanian Cup Final.jpg
• File:Sepsi-laszlo.jpg
• File:Burca-ovidiu.jpg
• File:Bourceanu-alexandru.jpg
• File:Ricketts tosaint.jpg

File uploaded by Zupfk (talk · contribs) are grabbed from fan bases, other random websites or screenshots. Remainings of a copyvio uploader. --Martin H. (talk) 08:07, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jack-gulick.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No real source, no real permission given, orphaned. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:18, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Europcar-jersey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Company logo/commercial shirt. Eeekster (talk) 17:41, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Plus Hangout.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Contains elements of the Google+ homepage which are most likely copyrighted SoWhy 19:41, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Examples of the Google+ interface will certainly contain the Google logo in them - this is inevitable. Please remove the "Delete" tag from this photo! -erochelson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erochelson (talk • contribs) 21:01, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

God Wikipedia sucks. Has it been invaded by the Germans? What type of Aspie says a comment like "Contains elements of the Google+ homepage which are most likely copyrighted"?!?! Google wouldn't have a leg to stand on if they wanted to sue. Grow some common sense and some balls.

It's lucky that this is a popular topic, because otherwise another copyright troll loser would have deleted it already by now! 118.90.14.165 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.