The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:COMANF.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Action shot from a Brazilian military exercise. Web-resolution. I doubt very much that the uploader is the actual photographer of this image. GrapedApe (talk) 01:22, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I've notified the uploader. They have not edited in 6 months, so I wouldn't hold my breath.--Danger (talk) 14:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Howard Scott & John Gregory; CHQ, Rushland, PA.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Howard Scott & John Gregory; CHQ, Rushland, PA.JPG Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this is the place to post a replay, but here goes. I was the person who originally uploaded the file to Wikipedia, and I did so with the express permission of William DesJardins, the Webmaster of Technocracy.ca [1] which is where I got it from (it came from a gallery of other pictures which is now located here [2]). William DesJardins is a member of the organisation Technocracy Incorporated which owns the photo, he got permission to digitise and upload the photo to the Internet from the organisation’s headquarters (where it was in an old archive). He told me that there would be no problem uploading it to Wikipedia (and the same for all the other photos he had archived) and told me to upload it under the Creative Commons License, since I couldn't quite work out all the different copyright categories on Wikipedia that seemed like the best thing to do. The organisation Technocracy Incorporated has given permission for these and similar photos to be used for the purpose of educating people about their movement, which is exactly what it achieves by being on Wikipedia. And since Technocracy is an anti-capitalist and anti-copyright ideology I find it pretty ridiculous for people to be worrying about this sort of thing. If you are in doubt about any of this you can contact William DesJardins though the website. If, for some reason the Creative Commons License is not applicable to this, then it may be applicable to some other category, such as fair use, perhaps. Either way it should certainly not be deleted. --Hibernian (talk) 04:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC) (User:Hibernian).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amar Praner Priya.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• - Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 17:16, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snapgragon-g1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• A picture of a toy is a derivative work. Relicensing under fair use will not help, as the article it was used in has been redirected. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:15, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:From the archive of the Tbilisi State Academy of Arts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The license provided for this is ((PD-US-1923-abroad)). However, the uploader seems to be confused about the date of the image. In this eit it was put as 1928. In this 1946 was used, and here 1928 again. In any case, 1928 is not before 1923. Muhandes (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ohio Uniform Traffic Ticket.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• While original works of the US Federal Government are public domain, this does not apply to state governments. There is no evidence that this has been released into the public domain, and I'd guess it meets a threshold of originality to be copyrightable. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:54, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:24, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Becky-stern.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This photo, according to the Flickr page, is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0, which is not a free license. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 23:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've contacted Bre Pettis about removing the "nc" restriction, making it a "free enough" license. Please let me if this is incorrect --Jamiew (talk) 16:57, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bre has updated his license to allow commercial usage of this photograph. I'm going to go ahead and remove the warning/objection. --Jamiew (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khatami Jewish.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The claim made for the image belonging to public domain is based on 30 years passing from the death of creator. However, the image shows Mr Khatami in his middle ages (no more than 10 years ago) which means the public domain license is fake. huji—TALK 23:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Huji's assessment of this situation. --Danger (talk) 00:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.