The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lee Jonghyun.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Has both watermark and source link that it came from the musician's Facebook page. We hope (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yevadu-61.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Listed as CC 3.0 as own work. Source link shows this is a movie poster. We hope (talk) 00:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basic Info.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Screen capture of copyrighted website. Not being used for an article. Eeekster (talk) 01:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Violet Cowden OnWing.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• LOC search turns up no images. The identical image is found on this website. No evidence this orphaned image is from the US government. We hope (talk) 01:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Image appears to be quite similar to one on her obituatry here. It identifies the location as Europe in WWII and it is clearly on a runway. Since it isn't indicated as being from a news source, it is reasonable to assume it was taken by someone in the Army's payroll and it could clearly be PD. Buffs (talk) 00:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike Evans and Menachem Begin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: uploader claims image has copyleft licence but the source page provided clearly only licences the text with a CC BY-SA 3.0 copyright. ww2censor (talk) 04:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerusalem Prayer Team Logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: only text on the source page is freely licenced despite the claim by the uploader. ww2censor (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Igikpak2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mount Igikpak.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Technocain.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Two images of Techno Viking and Herman Cain, no suggestion that they are in the public domain as the uploader claims. Otterathome (talk) 10:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Technoviking.jpg (Techno_Viking) . the image of Herman Cain is also a screen grab from a video. I created this composite image in response to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Separated_at_birth#images (which I think is a better image) Why wouldn't this be fair re-use? If you take this down, you will have to take down http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Technoviking.jpg . Or you could just be nice and let wikipedia be wikipedia. --phalseid (talk) 18:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I imagine this would be fair use in certain contexts, but fair use images on Wikipedia need to follow certain criteria, for example to be used in an article to illustrate something important (Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria). —innotata 16:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Allele Live 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I turned down a copyvio tagging because the files were not the same. I am a bit worried that this is still a copyvio due to the history of the uploader Guerillero | My Talk 17:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GM Rodemaker sm.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned file, link to permission web page and image are dead. Web archive has not archived them, site still active at http://tacticalhapkido.com/index.htm, I see no current permission.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 18:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dog Fashion Disco-Day Of The Dead EP 3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is claimed to be public domain but there is source or proof backing that claim up. MGA73 (talk) 20:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gmonster9.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned file. The image at http://www.toothoftime.com/wisconsinart/about_the_artist.htm is smaller (and earlier!) - if blown up and tweaked in Photoshp, then it's very close to the WP image  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:54, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:GMRodemaker Ki BD.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Orphaned file, link to permission web page and image are dead. Web archive has not archived them, site still active at http://tacticalhapkido.com/index.htm, I see no current permission  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:04, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:OpenMSX UnknownReality Scope.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• OpenMSX is free software, but license of Unknown Reality is unknown. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EdgarFelixSign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of copyrighted sign which is probably not the author's own work. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• The sign displays only one element that would be eligible for copyright, the borough seal/shield which was created in 1887 and has long since passed any copyright claims (and even if it were, it certainly would fall under de minimus). The emblem is even washed out, so the de minimus concept applies even further. Since there is no element passing copyright minima, the sign appears PD and a photo of the sign would fall under whatever copyright the photographer wishes. Buffs (talk) 00:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pall-mall-blue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Probably not author's own work — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gndubottombanner.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Unused file, contains university logo, whole thing may be copyvio, not found a match... yet...  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:21, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mo'hits records.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Says "there are no copyrights" but there is no proof or source backing that up. MGA73 (talk) 21:27, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete.-FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:36, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goat-rock-hy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Bartletts-Ferry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Incorrect licenses. Date from web site (http://www.industcards.com/hydro-usa-fl-ga.htm) is
  

Photograph courtesy of Georgia Power Co Posted 18 Jan 2004
Web site main page says Many thanks to the power companies, suppliers, individuals, and others who provided these photographs. We regret that we are unable to make them available to third parties

 Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• • Delete obvious copyvio, could have been tagged for speedy deletion. —innotata 16:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:OliverDam.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Same image found at http://www.lakehouse411.com/lake-information/892/OliverLake1.jpg - much bigger, later date. Suggest both obtained from same (but now not online) source.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Godspeed Cover Art.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of a record cover - can be seen at a few sites (e.g. http://www.last.fm/music/Xyloblast/Godspeed+%28E.P.%29). Probably personal photo, no point making non-free, as not used.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.