The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. File at Commons also nominated for deletion. — ξ^xplicit 23:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Box of iPhone 3G. Took the picture myself.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• iphone product box. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that Apple has given permission to consumers to publish photos under free license(s). FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 06:08, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I wasn't sure what license I should give this pic. Or whether it's ok to have this uploaded to illustrate the iPhone 3G box on the iPhone article. I've been licensing a lot of photos under the dual license I assigned to this piece. Maybe it's okay to downsize the resolution and assign Fair Use to this? (Like this one?) Someone knowledgeable on this issue please advise. ~ Feureau E.S.P. (talk) 08:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete by Explicit. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:43, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Stpats crest.png derived from File:St_Patrick_Athletic.png
• File:Bray crest.png derived from File:Bw-crest-sm.png
• File:Sligorovers crest.png derived from File:SligoRovers.png
• File:Shamrockrovers crest.png derived from File:Srfc_crest.png
• File:Ucd_crest.png derived from File:UCD_Dublin.png
• File:Limerick crest.png derived from File:Limerick_FC_logo.png

I would also suspect that the following are derived File:Galwaydl crest.png, File:Mervue crest.png Fasach Nua (talk) 08:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Plymouth-Argyle.gif derived from File:Plymouth_Argyle_FC.svg Fasach Nua (talk) 18:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Longfordtown.png derived from File:LongfordTown.png Fasach Nua (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GodsmackHitStores.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Picture of an album cover, the copyright is still held by the record label and graphic artist. — ξ^xplicit 07:29, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Tim Song (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GodsmackStores.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Picture of an album cover, the copyright is still held by the record label and graphic artist. — ξ^xplicit 07:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:FC metalist kharkiv.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a logo, but it doesn't seem in my view to meet any of the criteria shown in the license used? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coles Meat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low res, no EXIF data and looks to be from a PDF file. Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Bidgee (talk) 14:13, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coles Bakery.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low res, no EXIF data and looks to be from a PDF file. Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Bidgee (talk) 14:14, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coles External.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low res, no EXIF data and is distorted (could be from a PDF file). Unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Bidgee (talk) 14:15, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:File name.ext (delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason Mcelite (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is owned by me. It was taken by my sister who was at the event with her camera. I have no idea why this is now occurring after the few years it has been up.Mcelite (talk) 14:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phi Kappa Psi badge on green background.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason this image is non-free NYCRuss ☎ 19:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. No reason given for deletion. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not specifying the reason. Phi Kappa Psi's badge is protected by a trademark, and the file should indicate as such. This means that it should only be permitted on Wikipedia under the fair use guidelines. It is not currently being used on a page, so I believe that it should be deleted. NYCRuss ☎ 12:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trademark is not at issue here though. It is true that trademark would prevent another fraternity from using the logo design for their own fraternity, but it does not generally prevent most other uses. The discussions here is about copyright. Unless the fraternity crest changed at some point since 1852 (when the fraternity was founded), the crest design would now be in the public domain. Best, IronGargoyle (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.