The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Band of 27 Squadron SAAF, WW2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of a band. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:28, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom Warder.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Historical photo of some sort. Likely copyrighted, given this editor's track record. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:30, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MuZemike (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shana 910 low.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pir Pagaro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Black and white historical photo - Likely copyrighted, given this editor's track record. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MPMuar flag.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Country/province flag. Possibly copyrighted, given the graphical representation. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Clearly in the wrong forum. — ξ^xplicit 01:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HailtoPittPAHall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Eeekster (talk) 07:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• It is an unfree image and has been thoroughly tagged with appropriate copyright notice and extensive non-free media use rationale for over a year. Why was this listed? CrazyPaco (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep If you want to nominate for deletion, do so elsewhere. This image is non-free and is appropriately labeled as such. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:DC suit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Eeekster (talk) 11:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I work for the subject (David Campbell), and control the copyright for this picture Brianwilsonisgod (talk) 11:44, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  This is clearly copyrighted work. If you own the copyright, please take a read over at WP:DCM. — ξ^xplicit 01:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wnapbarbarabush1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• And the other examples from Dave Morice are uploaded with the CC-BY-SA license by user User:Mkacer, who does not seem to be the owner of the artworks, nor the original author. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 13:38, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prof M R S Rao photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• NC-ND is NOT BY-SA!!! Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Incompatible license; replaceable image. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:49, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:17, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bluesharpsandmic.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The link does not specify a license and seems to imply that it is for use on Wikipedia only.  fetchcomms☛ 23:08, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The lead sentence in the thread states that it is only going to be used on the portal, which is not an appropriate restriction. Moreover, the user promises "nothing commercial", which is incompatible with our licenses (restore if proper OTRS permission is obtained). — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.