The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the discussion was: keep, file does not belong in this venue as it is licensed under fair use. Files for deletion is that way. — ξxplicit 02:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.nps.gov/kowa/index.htm http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/projects/WashingtonDC/korean.html http://sc94.ameslab.gov/tour/korean_mem.html Now two .gov domains and one .mil (from a quick search) have to remove them as well? That's not how copyright law works for things like this. --350z33 (talk) 21:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Disney obviously owns the designs, but personal photos of the designs are allowed. Someone can edit my photos with those permissions.
Disney obviously owns the designs, but personal photos of the designs are allowed. Someone can edit my photos with those permissions.
Show me the law that pertains to these sculphttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_July_14&action=edit§ion=12tures and how photographs of them violate it (especially photos taken in public places) and then we can deal with it.--350z33 (talk) 00:48, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Again, you do not seem to fully understand that you do not have the rights to license it however you choose. Your work constitutes a derivative work and is thus subject to the original copyright owner. See Commons:Commons:Derivative works. In order to license it for Wikipedia only it would require you to have the copyright to the entire photo, which you don't (you are not uploading your elements of the photo but the entire thing). Second, it would be against Wikipedia's mission to have such an option. The law does not differentiate between commercial and non-commercial usage for copyright ownership. The law does differentiate between the two in what constitutes a copyright violation. The photo that is only of the soldiers cannot be used as a fair use photo in Wikipedia as it is currently, however, since it needs to meet certain requirements (see WP:NFCC; which incorporates the 4 factors you mention above). The licensing that has been given for "KoreanWarMemorialSoldiers" is false: "I, the copyright holder of this work...". This means "KoreanWarMemorialSoldiers" can be deleted immediately, since you are not the sole copyright owner.--Jorfer (talk) 23:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]