The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monica Abbott 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyrighted TV screenshot Alx 91 (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LPL logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Given user history (see thier upload log) I am skeptical that this (which seems to be a logo) is PD-self as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forum(KQED).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• obsoleted/duplicated by File:Forum(KQED).png and unfree. requested by uploader. emerson7 08:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hardcoretitle.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Doubtful of PD-self claim - Wrestling belt? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antares-sun.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image is from the SOHO. All SOHO images are copyrighted and are never NASA-PD see the SOHO copyright notice. Aldebaran66 (talk) 15:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Artcell (20).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• TV screenshot - Skpetical as to self claim Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kms windows mobile.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Screenshot of software, no claim to a free license. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Keep; OTRS permission received. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JPChangeux-small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Uploaded was asked to supply permissions by email in 2008. This apparently hasn't happened yet. The two weeks that this PUF listing will run should be quite long enough. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:19, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• I did supply the permission. I did it several time. Changeux and I have been trying to get this picture stably in wikipe/media for years now. "because the information on its source or copyright status is disputed." Disputed by WHO? Just tell-me what I have to write and where, so that completely silly recurring episode stops. As if we did not have better to do. This picture have been donated to me by Jean-Pierre Changeux himself. It belonged to him. We put it in the public domain, because none of the other licensing systems worked at that time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenov (talk • contribs) 22:58, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some other websites using this picture of Changeux (it is the one of the pictures he systematically provides): http://www.freebase.com/search?limit=30&start=0&query=changeux, http://www.canalacademie.eu/spip.php?article4852, http://cinp.org/congress/past-events/munich-2008/awards-2008/cinp-pioneer-award/, http://www.medicine.uottawa.ca/uobmri/fra/evenements.html, http://plgomes.blogspot.com/2009/11/changeux-neurociencia-e-conhecimento.html, http://fens2008.neurosciences.asso.fr/pages/program.html, http://www.monumenta.com/2008/content/view/69, http://www.inb.u-bordeaux2.fr/siteneuro2/pages/Lundisemin/archisemin/archSemin07/Changeux.php, http://www.admiroutes.asso.fr/larevue/2009/94/changeux.htm, http://www.canalacademie.com/Hommage-a-Jean-Bernard,1126.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenov (talk • contribs) 23:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Permission for this photo has been received by OTRS. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 12:19, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Wrong venue. Moved to Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 January 17. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Leo sam harry.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Fails NFCC criteria 3, 8 and 9 HJMitchell You rang? 21:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:55, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Robyn Butler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is the copyright holder. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 22:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colin Clive.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Film screenshot or publicity still - unklikely to be Self as claimed but willing to be proved wrong Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:00, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parkviewschool.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Google images are owned by Goolge. ? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.