The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Handheld PC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• While the uploader claims to have released the image into the public domain, there is no evidence that the screenshot centrally featured in the picture is freely usable or that the uploader has the capacity to release that image into the public domain. RJaguar3 | u | t 02:35, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screen2132.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Although the uploader claims to have released this image into the public domain, it is not clear that the uploader holds the copyrights to the non-free software whose screenshot is centrally featured. RJaguar3 | u | t 02:37, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tough2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Although the uploader claims to release the image under GFDL and CC-BY-SA 3.0, there is no evidence that uploader holds the copyright to the non-free software centrally featured in the image. RJaguar3 | u | t 02:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waterpark.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks an awful lot like an artist's rendering to me. Note that part of the outer (transparent) enclosure is cutaway to avoid obscuring detail within the enclosure. Highly unlikely to be the uploader's work, or to be licensed freely. Powers ^T 03:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:56, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jennette-2010-ACM-Awards-jennette-mccurdy-11643262-817-1222.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image taken from web site whose logo is still on the image. Likely copyrighted | Uncle Milty | talk | 15:10, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn Skier Dude (talk 04:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PremiumSoft Navicat Premium Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• 3,000 x 1,000 pixels is not a low resolution logo that contravenes the non-free usage claims made for logos. I believe it is a serious copyright infringement that should either be deleted or replaced with a much lower resolution version. Simple Bob (talk) 22:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I reduced the file to about 2/3s of a megapixel and tagged it as ((Non-free reduced)). No need to delete the whole file. Powers ^T 23:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:56, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy with the reduced resolution logo so have removed the deletion tag from the image. --Simple Bob (talk) 07:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.