The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Old Logo of 99.5 RT.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Old logo would still be protected by copyright. Eeekster (talk) 01:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PPT Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo, unlikely to be owned by the uploader. Eeekster (talk) 01:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:BCA2010 companies 1star large.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• award logo used on article for group that rcv'd it; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 01:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gary david.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• web resolution, no source, on-court shot - uploader has history of (c) violations Skier Dude (talk 01:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cocleary secbillionaire book.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• book cover used on 2 articles, neither for the book or article; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 02:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cult info logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• logo used on bio article with no critical commentary; no FuR Skier Dude (talk 02:16, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:2002-03 Premier League team of the season.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• collage of 11 images (football players) - no sources for any of the images Skier Dude (talk 04:04, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep, file licensed under fair use. — ξ^xplicit 00:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:20080627 RSFlogo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo from (c) website, no indication of release to PD Skier Dude (talk 04:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: I would certainly agree with you that the image is not said to be in the public domain by the creator and owner of the image; however, since it is the logo of an organization and is used to illustrate its relevant article, I've converting the image's licensing into fair-use rational. I am tempted to say that the image is applicable for the public domain, since it could be argued that it "consists of typefaces, individual words, slogans, or simple geometric shapes", but because of the road-icon, I played it safe and filed fair use. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cardinal Ottaviani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• this is likely not PD in the US - 1945 Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cardinal Ratzinger7R.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source information makes it unclear if this is PD-US Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn - ((PD-US-1996)) . Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chen zhi gong in Swordswoman of Huangjiang.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is there any evidence this movie is in the public domain? 1930. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:11, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brenda Landon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Never copyrighted works do not fall into the public domain in the US for 125 years after creation. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn - likely ((PD-US-1996)) Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:09, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crosline.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• no evidence provided copyright was not renewed in US Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CzyzPortait.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I don't see it is proven that the copyright was not renewed in the US - this is necessary for us to house it at en.wp. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Excuse me, that's misstated, I meant to say it's likely not public domain because it is c. 1935. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:10, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PalestineEnv.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Contributor was blocked for copyvios; this doesnt look like a personal photo. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 06:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tiger Beat magazines.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative of non-free magazine covers. — ξ^xplicit 06:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlKarama Battle Field.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Contributor was blocked for copyvios; the description suggests it is derived from a satellite photo, without identifying the photo it is derived from, so we cant find out the ownership of the photo. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 07:36, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SRIRANGAM.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a scan of printed material. Eeekster (talk) 07:59, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Actor-prassana.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like the file was lifted from moviegalleri.blogspot.com Eeekster (talk) 08:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telephonegameposter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claimed as CC-BY but resembles poster - Credit in poster is to Grey Duck Productions NOT uploader Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SACI LOGO orange.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo - NOT GFDL-self as claimed - Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noctorro-toy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 14:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramulus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photo of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 14:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rapticon.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No source, photo of a non-free toy anyways. J Milburn (talk) 14:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:MichaelGambon1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I don't believe that the alleged source of this image owns the copyright, nor has the right to license it under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 – ukexpat (talk) 15:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Then why is it listed on the Russian Wiki? Because that's where I retrieved it from. Tinton5 (talk) 15:55, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - probably shouldn't be. If I could speak and write Russian I would have queried it there too. I will also add that the copyright status of the same file on Commons, commons:File:MichaelGambon.jpg, has also been queried. – ukexpat (talk) 16:25, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:TheManvils2010a.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Replaceable copyrighted image. Has clear copyright tag in upload edit summary as well as in summary section of the data. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:25, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:McCoy2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality upload by user who has 1# Been blocked for copyvio uploads before, and 2# Only uploaded low quality shots before. Nymf _hideliho! 17:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:McCoy 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• High quality upload by user who has 1# Been blocked for copyvio uploads before, and 2# Only uploaded low quality shots before. Nymf _hideliho! 17:58, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noctorro-toy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Photograph of a non-free toy. J Milburn (talk) 19:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:R2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User claims to be the copyright holder, but the caption of the article has the word "vocero" in parenthesis. (El Vocero is a daily newspaper in Puerto Rico). User has a file that was deleted as F9 1. Jmundo (talk) 20:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Similar file by the same uploader:File:Ricky1Ricky.jpg.--Jmundo (talk) 15:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JoeGaetjens.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Claim that (C) was not renewed - but it seems that St Louis Post-Dispatch did regularly renew copyright (run the paper title through google's copyright search). TheGrappler (talk) 22:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.