< October 28	October 30 >

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:JosefHofmann1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Also nominating higher resolution version by same uploader: File:JosefHofmann2.jpg

Uploader claims source is the Internet, which may not be free or not have a license compatible with Wikipedia. Zoo Fari 00:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vokle screenshot.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Screenshot which contains possibly unfree interface and logos. Zoo Fari 01:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nile 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Useless image with no encyclopedic use. Cannibaloki 02:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Fair use rationale provided. — ξ ^xplicit 07:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KMC&H logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((non-free logo)). It should be fine now. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PORC POSTER.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Shell Kinney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Napalm Death Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damnation2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damnation2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damnation2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damnation2005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Damnation2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Testamentcopy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSposter copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MONSETPOSTER copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TherapyWolves copy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

concert poster; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KS3U8846 caption.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

copyright claim and watermark do not agree Skier Dude (talk) 03:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PORC POSTER.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Flyer of an upcoming concert by Porcupine Tree at Wolverhampton Civic Hall. Image probably uploaded to use Wikipedia for advertising or promotion. This kind of work normally is copyrighted, right? Cannibaloki 03:21, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kalibo seal.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

municipal seal; no source; if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karen gillon 200.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

given bad pixelation and artefacts, appears to be scanned from undisclosed source Skier Dude (talk) 03:25, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I provided this image. There is no copyright issue with it, it is free. It's just an old image, hence the low quality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulineward (talk • contribs) 20:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's noted as "portrait" image - no source - is there a note on who took the portrait or what the portrait was for? Skier Dude (talk) 03:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kassy!.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

no source, appears to be publicity shot Skier Dude (talk) 03:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kdmglogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hot973khdk.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kelton logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jeffnat logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:This Providence.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

screenshot or promotional image licensed as PD-self Skier Dude (talk) 03:37, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:InstituteBusinessFinance logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:38, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kirilmetodiskopje.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

university logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:40, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kk logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KorfezBS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

FC logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kronenwetter Header.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

civic logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ksmpicture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned, no source, no metadata, appears to be promotional picture Skier Dude (talk) 03:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LMTSOM logo small.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LMTSOM logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Alquimista.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lamcologo.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lcn lp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Let There Be Rock.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lamcologo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kept, license changed to PD text logo. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Libyan Times.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Surely this is ((PD-text))? — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LnbcQvRDTwQYIlPAU4Iu94qbZ3Ycidj37BRLu41 Oi2Ir7xaaGrOV1EarsLaHiut.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Brick-Academy-Bicentennia color sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 03:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Dr Prabhat Das Foundation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo (business ad?); no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo del m19.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

political group/party logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Webframe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logos; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:09, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qpclogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logos & business cards ; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2000 award image.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate ad material; no specific source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of Student Union of IFE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo-intranet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned scholastic logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:12, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logoawardcclp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate award image; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LogotipoBDRI.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Looptopia 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

event poster; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 04:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cclp stamp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

scholastic seal/logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Educationchartercclp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

book cover; no source; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 04:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MBClogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

sports logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macabilogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

sports team logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maccabi.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

sport logo (? no description); no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maci.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

no source, no metadata, appears to be professional /promotional shot Skier Dude (talk) 04:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maci3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

no source, no metadata, appears to be professional/promotional shot Skier Dude (talk) 04:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Macon SEAL.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

city seal; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((non-free logo)). It should be fine now. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malayan High School of Science Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((non-free logo)). It should be fine now. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:58, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iankeaggy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

no source, no metadata, appears to be professional/promotional shot Skier Dude (talk) 04:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:50, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Us-sc-flo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

civic logo used as centre of "flag" (would not pass de minimis); no source Skier Dude (talk) 04:43, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the flag of Florence anyway? If you look here at the city website, there are four flags shown outside what I guess is the city hall. There's SC, US and then two I don't know but one must be the city flag. Neither of them is this one. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:46, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mangosearch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mar17 Page 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I really don't think the uploader is the (c) holder for a newspaper Skier Dude (talk) 04:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((Non-free newspaper image)) and ((subst:Newspaper rationale |The Temple News | The Temple News)). It should be fine now. These two tags should be added to any non-free newspaper being properly used. -- Eastmain (talk) 03:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marianrentaalbumcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned album cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marion logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned city logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((non-free logo)). It should be fine now. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marquette Iron Rangers Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned sports logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((non-free logo)). It should be fine now. -- Eastmain (talk) 04:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Master Logo from Business Cards4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mastheaddddd.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Temple News (Cloister Black).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

newspaper logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:55, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((non-free logo)). It should be fine now. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aaliyahfullshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

A promotional image of the individual, no indication that the uploader owns the copyright to this image. — ξ ^xplicit 04:55, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:McDowellHigh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mcdowell High.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mcdlogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mcdowelllogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mcdowell News.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

school newspaper logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mediaprima.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 04:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melissasmith.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

no source, no metadata, appears to be professional/promotional shot Skier Dude (talk) 05:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mentor Cardinals.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Merrimacklogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mg logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael Amott in Japan 2007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

no source, no metadata, appears to be professional/promotional shot Skier Dude (talk) 05:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept as source & license corrected/provided Skier Dude (talk) 01:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MindanaoPolytechnicCollege.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. changing the image tag to ((non-free logo)). --Bluemask (talk) 11:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MinotaurCrest transparent.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

sports logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mmlpt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned, appears to be album cover (too small to read fine print) Skier Dude (talk) 05:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mobpon logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:07, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moderndesigncovers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

montage of magazine covers; unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude (talk) 05:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MontenegroSong2008.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Multicolored International School of Music logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

0rphaned school logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Music spoken word.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:16, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MSNLogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Harlow's Weekly March 22 1930 PP1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

old newspaper scan - no source provided, license can't be PD-self Skier Dude (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NEAD Logo 08.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NIFCCLOGO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

sports logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naraya logo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nea Moudania Municipal Flag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

civic logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:25, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Necaxa logo 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

sports club logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nescom logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

school logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((non-free logo)). It should be fine now. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Logo1.jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned FC logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:New smag logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewDealMarket2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:27, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:33, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:NewLife Fellowship.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:28, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Southland Museum and Art Gallery.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added ((non-free logo)). It should be fine now. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smag-multi-mots-gris-lowered-ligne rouge-cropped.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs).

orphaned corporate logo, no source, if legit uploader would not be (c) holder, if not, no need for user-created art here Skier Dude (talk) 05:29, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winning & Shatner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

An image from IMDb credited to Derek Lang, no indication that the uploader owns copyright of the image or received permission to use it. — ξ ^xplicit 06:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Napo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

* Uses images from Google Earth which, although Freeware (albeit there is a commercially licensed version - Google Earth Pro - available), it is a copyrighted program of which the source is private and not open source. This inherently invalidates the claim that the image is possibly the author's own work. While it is true that the author may have created the parameters to produce the imagery, the author used a non-free program. Thus, the license would more accurately be served under fair-usage as a screen-shot, but not as the author's own work. ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 14:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jay cuttler's abdiminal muscles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is owned by Iovate Health Sciences Inc. Picture was a wallpaper created for MuscleTech.com. Yankees76 (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ronnie coleman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image was copied from http://www.ironmagazineforums.com/gallery/data/500/1544092046ronnie_coleman.jpg which was possibly scanned from a bodybuilding magazine from the early 2000's. Yankees76 (talk) 16:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MervLukebaRedCarpet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

watermarked image ww2censor (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. File tagged as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 06:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EE Berkeley 1968.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Uploader notes the image is copyrighted in the US Verbal chat 20:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
From uploader: the image is tagged non-free and I have obtained emailed permission from the copyright owner to copy the image into the wikipedia article:I suggest that anyone who doubts my assertion emails Terry Morrison at info@easwaran.org and ask him to confirm that he has given this permission. I hope this is sufficient to allow me to reinstate the picture in the original article DuncanCraig1949 (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WHAT HAPPENS NOW? (I'm not an experienced wikipedia contributor so am a bit worried). if you check out my talk page then you can see that, on there, I wrote to Anomie: "you have added a note that unless there is another reason the listing will be deleted and the image kept. Do I need to do anything now to keep my image? Will the image be automatically restored in my article? (Sorry for these q's - am a relatively novice wikipedia user). thanks! DuncanCraig1949 (talk) 10:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)"

- And Anomie replied:

- "It seems Verbal screwed up. WP:PUI is for files that the uploader claims are free but someone doubts it. Your file is clearly claimed as non-free, so PUI isn't the place for it. Most likely an admin will come along and close the discussion for that reason; Verbal may or may not take it to WP:FFD if that was his original intention. Anomie⚔ 12:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)"

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DuncanCraig1949" Hidden categories: User talk pages with Uw-spam1 notices

- Do I now need to do anything to get this photo "unblocked"? (It disappeared from the article I had inserted it in, presumably because of the PUI tag put on by Verbal) DuncanCraig1949 (talk) 20:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- - Nothing has happened for weeks, so I have removed the inappropriate PUI tag from the photo DuncanCraig1949 (talk) 20:48, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well I can't see the problem that was flagged originally. It has a fair use rationale, that seems fair, it comes from a website, that gives limited permission. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ray Joseph Cormier.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Uploader stated that he was "offered a free portrait." Such free portraits have their copyright maintained by the photographer, not the subject. Hipocrite (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the subject of the BLP, this is my current portrait on turning 65 in May. I own it, and released it to be used. For those interested, take note that Hipocrite, the person questioning this photo, also just nominated the BLP Ray Joseph Cormier for deletion - again. He nominated it for deletion just last March but was unsuccessful in the effort as he was in his first attempt. Peace DoDaCanaDa (talk) 20:55, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You own the copyright to the image? Typically, with comercial photography like that the photographer retains the copyright. How was copyright conveyed to you? Hipocrite (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Proglas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

As long as this has been here, I don't see any evidence (nor any reason) why a proclamation by a guy who passed away in 1992 would be freely licensed. If non-free, its current usage here, here, or here don't seem appropriate. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.