The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:11, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a clear non-free image. No attribution or license information given. Source of article is here Electiontechnology (talk) 02:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Not deleted, no evidence of a violation. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Originally tagged as "non-free promotional"; license was changed to CC-3.0 after the image's replaceability was challenged. Unclear source. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:40, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

USER REPLY

Hi, well, yes, I don't really know which license I am supposed to put with that photo. The photo is actually mine and I am very interested in it not being deleted, so please, let me know what I shoul do if I want to tag it properly.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

listed as GFDL but this is a crop of an image by Scott Boehm/Getty Images North America - no evidence that the image is free Peripitus (Talk) 07:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:41, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

listed as a free licence but the linked flickr page states "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 Generic" - not a free image Peripitus (Talk) 07:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I did not see the non-commercial part. Please delete. -- Noj r (talk) 00:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Retagged, not deleted. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not clear that this image was published over 70 years ago, nor that it was anonymous, nor that, even if the foregoing are true, it is PD in the USA. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Given the provenance, I don't doubt that it was anonymous. The circa 1930s thing is tricky. If this was published before 1926, the image is certainly in the public domain (meeting ((PD-US-1996))), but that is not entirely clear at the moment. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Upon further reflection, I realized that this is a work of the Church of England. As such, it is an expired Crown Copyright per ((PD-BritishGov)). IronGargoyle (talk) 02:04, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Nascar.jpg
• File:Red Bull Indy.jpg
• File:Felipe Massa resized shell face.jpg

Uploader has a history of taking things from the Internet and claiming he is the owner of the rights to the image. See File:Nascar-drafting-1.jpg, File:Sprint nascar02.jpg, File:24HoldenM m.jpg and [1]. User was previously warned about uploading such images and claiming rights, removed the warning, and subsequently uploaded this image and others listed here. While I can't confirm if the images are in fact stolen, it's highly likely they have been. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by ESkog (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:18, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Nascar.jpg above. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:53, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tineye found this which logged-in users can view at high resolution. I've speedied as copyvio. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:00, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nakon (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 23:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probable copyvio: Ringside shot from the 2008 Olympics that would have been virtually impossible without a press pass, uploaded without date or metadata. Used only in userspace. Upload was performed less than one hour after editor's previous copyvio upload got deleted. Durova^Charge! 20:57, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:18, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader is most likely not the artist or copyright holder. Nv8200p talk 21:01, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

This page is for possibly unfree files, i.e. files tagged as free where there is a doubt as to their freedom. Files tagged fair use don't go here. Stifle (talk) 10:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As explained in the file summary image was was obtained via Google. WebHamster 21:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with ((dfu)) or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 23:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.