The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Alexf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jared-borgetti-chivas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image looks to high qulity to be self made. The image looks like it came from this website. GoPurple'nGold₂₄ 00:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - The user has a history of uploading copyrighted image with a free license (I think this exact image has been uploaded before). It's an obvious copyvio. --76.117.210.109 (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:VanHilleary.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• http://bioguide.congress.gov/copyright.htm --Kostelca (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marilyn Lloyd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• http://bioguide.congress.gov/copyright.htm --Kostelca (talk) 11:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Old Parliament Building, Sri Lanka.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a scan of some sort. Uploader has added many other problem images. J Milburn (talk) 15:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colombo Train Station.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a scan of some sort, I doubt this is the uploader's own work. Uploader has added numerous other problem images. J Milburn (talk) 15:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saint Anselm on FOXNEWS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative of copyrighted Fox News broadcast. No license or nonfree use rationale. Durova³⁹⁰ 17:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Durova, how do I get FOX's copyright? Do I email them asking I want to put an image I took of my school on their network on Wikipedia????? Or are there any other means... please get back to me --Ericci8996 (talk) 15:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)Eric Ricci[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joinus2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyrighted advertisement. No license or nonfree use rationale. Durova³⁹⁰ 17:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.