The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

–Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1948 creation date means it may not be PD in Mexico, GFDL or CC would not apply regardless. MBisanz ^talk 04:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is a diploma, which is a standard form with the recipient's name being entered. Simple forms are not copyrightable. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some forms are copyrightable... but I don't believe this one is. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial image, no OTRS permissions. MBisanz ^talk 05:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded with two tags. The public domain tag is saying that it is in the public domain because it was published before 1977, but there is no supporting evidence that it was published without copyright, or that copyright has since expired. The second tag for a film screenshot is also incorrect as it is a cropped version of File:Item 1950 1.jpg, which is a lobby card, (so the source stated is also wrong) used under a claim of fair use in the main article about the film. The cropped version was uploaded to use in the infobox of Natalie Wood, however there are free images to serve the same purpose. Rossrs (talk) 10:08, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that the source blog is the copyright holder, or that the copyright holder has actually released it per the license given. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source blog probably doesn't own the copyright, and at any rate there is no indication of the stated release. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same as the above two; sourced from a blog, no evidence of release. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete local version as Commons duplication; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The note at the bottom of the source page indicates the image is likely copyrighted, but I can't read the rest of it so I'm taking it here instead of deleting outright. Thoughts? (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:19, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a copy of an image on Commons (see the link at the bottom of the image page--also here). The file on Commons has an associated OTRS ticket. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted, the OTRS ticket doesn't cover this image (nor the ones below). – Quadell ^(talk) 23:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; likely uploader isn't copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've asked an another OTRS user to comment. – Quadell ^(talk) 01:15, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:26, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:27, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright but I can't read the rest; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:30, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 01:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright, I can't read the rest to see if there is any release/exception; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright, I can't read the rest to see if there is any release/exception; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright, I can't read the rest to see if there is any release/exception; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:47, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source indicates copyright, I can't read the rest to see if there is any release/exception; unlikely uploader is copyright holder. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:34, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See comment above Re: OTRS ticket on Commons (this isn't listed as far as I can tell, but it seems to be the same photographer). IronGargoyle (talk) 14:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted photograph of an artifact. The claim "these are not copyrightable in US law because they are accurate mechanical reproductions of works which are out of copyright, with no creative lighting or other creative input" is highly suspect. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:41, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by nominator.. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Source page ([1]) says: "License: Not public domain, personal use - You may use this picture for personal use, but keep in mind I don't have a release from the people in the picture." –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License fixed on the source website. It should have been listed as public domain.--y6y6y6 (talk) 17:15, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay; thanks (by the way, that's a really great resource! Thanks!). –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 17:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a photograph or scan of a magazine or newspaper picture, and an identical image exists at a Geocities page that apparently hasn't been updated since 1997: http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/6295/9697info.html Absent any sort of source information, there's no evidence that the image is self-made. Mosmof (talk) 23:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.