The Lion King

Previously reviewed. Currently, the article is listed as a Good Article and is ((A-Class)) for the Films WikiProject. There has been few changes done to the article recently, so I assume that all of the previous items have been done. Furthermore, it seems to be a good article and I would like to see it become featured. I'd like to know what can be done to make that happen. Thanks, Cbrown1023 00:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• This was previously a FAC and narrowly failed. The plot could do with a trim, but overall I support it. Wiki-newbie 12:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it should definately be shortened. Cbrown1023 15:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 22:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Text:

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

• Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.^[1]
• Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
• Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.^[2]
• Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), when doing conversions, please use standard abbreviations: for example, miles -> mi, kilometers squared -> km², and pounds -> lb.
• There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,
  • allege
  • might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, please strike this comment).^[3]
• Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. ^[4]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR _t 22:53, 18 December 2006 (UTC)