Shawn Michaels

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… I want to know what needs to be done, so the article can become an FA.

Thanks, --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Wrestlinglover's comments

Okay, I'll have more comments coming tomorrow since I got sidetracked from what I was doing when I wrote these.--WillC 10:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done and thanks for the comments. But, left some of my own. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Early life

Career

The article looks pretty good. I'll try to find time to read it again after you have everything changed from my comments and everybody else's comments as well.--WillC 08:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed/left comments. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okay.--WillC 21:33, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SRX's comments

Resolved comments from SRX
    • Lead
      • Looks good, but per new standards spelling out the wrestler's real name isn't necessary in the lead because it clutters it.
      • I would add a small prose about his personal life in the lead, because it has to explain more than just his career.
    • Early life
      • He was a stand-out Linebacker at Randolph High School and eventually became Captain of the football team. - no need to capitalize Linebacker
      • Then he began pursuing the career of a professional wrestler. - source?
More later...--SRX 21:58, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Will be waiting for more. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:24, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • Early career
      • After his training with Lothario, he debuted in Mid-South Wrestling in 1984 and later with Texas All-Star Wrestling (TAW) promotion. - either it has to be After his training with Lothario, he debuted in Mid-South Wrestling in 1984 and later with the Texas All-Star Wrestling (TAW) promotion. or After his training with Lothario, he debuted in the Mid-South Wrestling and Texas All-Star Wrestling (TAW) promotionsin 1984.
      • There, he and tag team partner Marty Jannetty (Frederick Jannetty) defeated The Batten Twins for the Central States Tag Team Championship, later losing it back to the Battens. - link to tag team?
      • In a raid of AWA talent in 1987, The Rockers were signed by a competing promotion: the World Wrestling Federation (WWF). - raid? what is meant by this?
        • Have no clue and has been removed.
      • They were fired from the WWF two weeks later, however, for "partying too hard" (a misunderstanding, according to Michaels' autobiography). - can an explanation be given as to what "partying too hard" means.
        • Does it have to go into "heavy" detail?
          • No, something brief as to what they did, like they socialized too much and didn't pay attention to their careers.--SRX 21:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      • The pair were billed as "The Midnight Rockers" and held the AWA World Tag Team Championship. - so they just held it? they didn't do anything to win it?
        • Added title info.

--SRX 22:52, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More concerns? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Rockers
    • They redebuted for the WWF at a house show on July 7, 1988.[18] Due to WWF chairman Vince McMahon's desire to have his performers carry WWF-exclusive monikers, they were renamed as simply "The Rockers. - who is they? (you are starting a new section remember) what is a moniker in this case?
      • Fixed. As for the moniker thing, I really don't know how to explain that. Suggestions?
        • how about ring name--SRX 23:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]
    • The team was a mid-card stalwart of television and pay-per-view shows for the next two years, but never seemed to get a chance at the WWF Tag Team Championships. - sounds like POV, sounds like you are stating that they never seemed to get a chance.
    • I removed the "never getting the chance at the tag titles".
    • The match was taped with The Rockers winning the belts, but soon after, Neidhart came to a stopgap agreement with management and was rehired. - stopgag?
    • The Rockers plodded along, eventually splitting on December 2, 1991 during an incident on Brutus "The Barber" Beefcake's (Edward Leslie) televised Barber Shop talk show promotional segment. - link to promotional segment?
    • Jannetty vanished from the company, and Michaels became a villain as "The Boy Toy." - I'm pretty sure people just can't vanish :)
  • Heartbreak Kid
    • Michaels failed to win the WWF Intercontinental Championship from Bret Hart in July 1992, even losing the WWF's first ever ladder match against him at a house show, a match where the objective is to climb a ladder and reach an object hanging above the ring. - past tense is ---> was
    • They were moved to the main event after The Ultimate Warrior (Brian Hellwig) suddenly departed from the WWF, leaving his tag team match with Randy Savage (Randall Poffo) against Ric Flair (Richard Fliehr) and Razor Ramon (Scott Hall) hanging. - hanging? seems to "wrestlingish" what really happened to the match, canceled?
      • The match took place, but without the UW. I have no idea on how to write that sentence out.
        • Umm, after The Ultimate Warrior was unable to compete in ______(the tag team match), so the rockers match was moved to the main event.--SRX 23:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • During this time, Michaels and Sherri split and his former partner Jannetty quickly reappeared. - coping with the comment above, what happened to him and how did he come back?
      • Storyline.
    • He returned to WWF television for November's Survivor Series pay-per-view, substituting for the arrested Jerry Lawler in a match pitting himself and three of Lawler's "Knights" against the Hart brothers, Bret, Bruce, Keith, and Owen. - was he really arrested?
    • This match was voted by fans as "Match of the Year." - and this match of the year was for whom?
    • This triggered a Michaels-Diesel split, a storyline that was drawn out until Survivor Series that November due to Michaels' hand injury. - and he got this hand injury where?
    • After this, Michaels took time off. - why did he take time off?

SRX 22:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:29, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clique's Influence

Yeah it should since it took place during this period.--SRX 13:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

--SRX 21:05, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMatthew's comments

Resolved comments from iMatthew

Lead

  • Where was Triple H on the first edition of Monday Night Raw?
    • Probably in WCW.
  • You should mention that Mid-South Wrestling is now known as Universal Wrestling Federation.
  • You talk about two different promotions, UWF and AWA. Then you say "There, Michaels..." make it more clear which you are talking about, UWF or AWA.
  • If we shouldn't say "the WWE", we shouldn't say "the WWF"
Disagree with this, we use the "the" for WWF because of the pronunciation of the name.--SRX 23:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Since his common name and article name is Shawn Michaels, you should probably refer to him as Michaels throughout the article, instead of Hickenbottom. None of his career did he go by Hickenbottom.
  • Try to avoid "joined forces", it sounds to non-wrestling (if you know what I mean)
  • Explain, elaborate on, or link "pushing the envelope" (I don't even know what it means)
    • I got nothing to replace that. Suggestions?
  • Per WP:EGG, do not link "wrestling academy" to the academy's article. Say "wrestling academy, called __________"
  • In 2006, Hickenbottom and Triple H briefly reformed DX, but after an injury left Triple H inactive making Hickenbottom return to singles wrestling. --> The sentence read's awkward, "but after an injury left Triple H inactive making Hickenbottom return"
    • I think I got it.
  • Also, for consistency purposes, change "Hunter Hearst Helmsley" to Triple H, because readers may think they are two different wrestlers.
Or elaborate that the name is shortened to Triple H (HHH).--SRX 23:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think later in the article might be a good idea to explain.
You don't want to confuse people in the lead. iMatthew (talk) 22:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Explained in the lead. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Overall, Hickenbottom is a four-time world champion: a three-time WWE Champion, and a one-time World Heavyweight Champion. --> Overall, Hickenbottom has been a world champion four times, including three reigns as WWE Champion, and one reign as World Heavyweight Champion.
  • The lead is supposed to summarize his career, and you never mention his time in Grand Slam Wrestling anywhere in the lead until you say he was their champion.

I'll get to the rest when this is completed. I'm going to split my review into a couple sections, so this is only the lead. iMatthew (talk) 23:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, got comments, will be waiting for more. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 20:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giggy

Pre-empting your FAC comments... Images

All sources appear fine to me. But I might be wrong... and there's a lot, so I may have skipped over one by accident.

More later. Giggy (talk) 23:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giants2008's comments

I think this needs a good copy-edit to be successful at FAC, because I'm finding a lot of little issues early in the article. Here are some examples; I don't claim to have caught every glitch.

Overall, I think this needs more work to become featured. If this was an FAC, I would probably oppose based on what I've read. Sorry to be so harsh, but I think it's better for you to hear it now than at an FAC nomination. Giants2008 (17-14) 01:51, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was told the same thing about the article needing work, that's why there's this PR. Hopefully, I got some of the concerns and will be waiting for more comments, if possible. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 15:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Peripitus

- overall the article is enjoyable but it has issues that need addressing. The in-universe terminology and language usage make it difficult to understand well if the reader is not already familiar with the material. A nice read though - Peripitus (Talk) 22:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making concerns, I got to them and hoping if there's anything more that should be done. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:00, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]