Article is definitely shaping up. Lots of references, thorough, with a lot of history. Some recent efforts have been made to make the article more balanced, although I'm sure more work could be done there. Inviting more input from the community.--Esprit15d 18:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- You are correct that achieving and maintaining a proper balance is going to be a long term concern for this page. One thing that jumped out at me with regards to the balance is the appearance of exclusive use of PETA sources for the time line section. Instead of having the grouping of four references, all to the peta website, at the top of the list it would be better to move the individual references to the portions of the time line where the information is actually used. --Allen3 talk 20:16, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no need to have a list of every website peta has ever made. Jon513 23:02, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]