Over the Edge (1998)

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 03:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…I want it to become at least a GA and future FA article. Please comment with any concerns, edits, errors. Cheers.

Thanks, TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've only gone through a couple of paragraphs in any detail, but I have a few comments:

1. Where did Dude Love return from (or return to)?

    Done-RewordedTrUCo⁹31¹ 00:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2. How and/or why did Dude Love and Vince McMahon form an alliance? And how does this relate to the match with Terry Funk?

    Doneexplained better.TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3. Is the Austin-Love match with Brisco, Patterson, and McMahon the one at Over The Edge (I haven't read ahead yet)? It's unclear when you say "McMahon announced a match".

I Changed it. Y

1. Was The Nation of Domination simply going by The Nation at this time?

Yes they were.TrUCo⁹31¹ 00:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually they were called both the Nation of Domination and The Nation, The Nation is just a derived version. So is it still ok?TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:38, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. It's not grammatically correct to say "..., thus ____ winning". It should be "..., thus ____ won".
2. Remember to keep verb tense consistent (in the past tense). There are a few places where you switch to the present tense.

I'll look it over in more detail when I have a chance. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Y, I also have done tense changing. For the background section.TrUCo⁹31¹ 21:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• From the header: "Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics..." Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why?TrUCo⁹31¹ 01:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Again quoting from the instructions above "This size of this page is limited. Please do not add images to peer reviews..." Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 15:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's a few things that stood out at me:

• Raw and SmackDown! should be italicized when referring to the actual show (not the brand).
• Remove all the bolding per MOS:BOLD.
• All awful lot of the text is wikilinked. I think the article might suffer from overlinking.
• The Other On-Screen Talent table is awkwardly placed, at least it is on my screen. The table is messing up the right-hand justification of the Results. Maybe moving it up or to the right would look better.
• By more consistent with the date linking. When you write out the whole date (ie. June 1 1998) link both parts. There are places in the article where you write out the whole date and it isn't linked. If you only write out the month and day (ie. June 1) don't link it. Actually, it might help with the overlinking problem if you eliminate the year in most cases when writing out the date and de-link the month and day.

Nikki311 00:51, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will get to that in 2 weeks.--TrUCo⁹31¹ 02:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]