American Idiot

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because it has a very significant anniversary coming up, and I am wondering just how much more would be expected of it to be a featured article - the biggest possible goal being on the front page for its 20th anniversary. One of my projects I got promoted fresh out of high school and into college, I remember adopting this nomination as a drive-by who needed guidance, and pushed it the rest of the way there; I didn't write most of this, just polished it at the time.

Thanks, dannymusiceditor ^oops 05:05, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FAC peer review sidebar

STANDARD NOTE: I have added this PR to the Template:FAC peer review sidebar to get quicker and more responses. When this PR is closed, please remove it from the list. Also, consider adding the sidebar to your userpage to help others discover pre-FAC PRs, and please review other articles in that template. Thanks! Z1720 (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MusicforthePeople

I did some citation clean-up before making this comment; I haven't looked at the prose.

• #48 (Greenday.fm – a Green Day fansite) – needs better source
• #81 (GNR Daily – a Guns N' Roses fansite) – needs better source
• #90 (Stacker) – what makes this reliable?
• #91 (Popdose) – what makes this reliable?
• #112 (BuzzJack) – I see this copies its info from Music Week; you'll need to replace it with the appropriate MW link
• #131 (Monsters and Critics) – what makes this reliable?
  • See, this one really sucks because the quote there is kinda important.
• #135 (Virgin Radio Italy) – cites a video, which doesn't look like it was archived; needs replacing
• #137 (Twitter fan account) – needs better source
• #145 (Facebook) – I'm aware of WP:SOCIALMEDIA, but is there coverage of this post available?
• #146 (Facebook) – see above

In external links, are the three fansites and The Internet Music Database links necessary? Otherwise, that's all I have on the sources. MusicforthePeople (talk) 22:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Query from Z1720

@DannyMusicEditor: It has been over a month since the last comment. Are you still working on this, or can it be closed and nominated at WP:FAC? Z1720 (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Working on it, yes, but I think it unlikely that I'm going to get further comments, so you can feel free to close it if you believe it to be time. Unless of course you'd like to give some feedback yourself. It needs some work I've self-identified outside the PR, but I will get to that in near time. dannymusiceditor ^oops 21:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]