I've just created one under an alt account, a bio of someone with an assertion of notability, but poorly written with no wikification and no references (I'll fix it up after this experiment runs). So far it's been patrolled, given a proper stub tag and a couple of wikilinks, and tagged with Template:BLP unsourced. My new account got a boilerplate Template:Welcome on its talk page. --Stormie (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Haven't updated this because I wanted to actually fix up my article first, and have not yet had a chance to. Anyway, the article is Haig Sare, and apart from the initial tagging and welcome on my test account's talk page, there hasn't been any activity at all. Confirms my theory that if something is looked at just once and deemed OK, it won't get a lot of further attention. --Stormie (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for doing that. A player in a non US sport is a pretty good test of the sort of article that can run into problems at newpage patrol, and the jawbreaking incident is a sad example of unsourced negative bio info sticking around for over a fortnight (I've added a source). ϢereSpielChequers 06:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]