The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Silly deletion discussion that is going nowhere extremely fast. (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 09:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Whiskeylore[edit]

User page created by another editor, written in third person. Fram (talk) 08:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Usually I'd vote to delete a page like this, but in this case the user has acknowledged it and doesn't seem to be mind. Zerbu ^💬 11:58, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As Martinp suggested, I am still somewhat new as a contributor and appreciated Fram's interest in opening a discussion thread based on items that I am editing. If this creates confusion or will weaken my standing within this thread to veterans of the editing community, then I can create my own. Otherwise, I am fine using this threat going forward. Thanks to all concerned. ~~~~ Whiskeylore (talk) 14:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Zerbu's evidence that Whiskeylore has acknowledged (and thanked for) the 3rd party creation of this page. While unusual (and perhaps Whiskeylore will edit the page and change it to 1st person at some point when they become more comfortable editing), there is therefore no problem. Martinp (talk) 12:52, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above keeps. —Alalch E. 17:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep due to Whiskeylore's acceptance of the page. Partofthemachine (talk) 06:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.