The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. This page obviously has zero value to Wikipedia, it is not a draft of an encyclopedia article so there is no chance it would ever be useful to anyone who was here to build an encyclopedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raquel Baranow/sandbox[edit]

User was sitebanned for Holocaust denialism, this page contains Holocaust denialism among other antisemitic and racist things. :3 F4U (they /it) 05:29, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, WP:NONAZIS and WP:NORACISTS (among others). There must be zero tolerance towards Holocaust denial, of any kind. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 12:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I disagree that the page contains unacceptable holocaust denial. This mfd is muckracking and grave dancing. If such a page were offensive, you should quietly blank it, not draw attention to it. SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:37, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blank. I concur with SmokeyJoe that it's unfortunate WP:GRAVEDANCING and unnecessary pillorying to go stroking through subpages of blocked users and put them up for deletion. As it is a sandbox, the best choice of action is to blank and not go through the MFD process. Save everybody the time and effort, and let's not turn this into our own soapbox against Holocaust deniers. It's enough to say that their views are wholly unwelcome on Wikipedia without having to use the MFD process as a megaphone. Cheers, ⛵ WaltClipper -(talk) 15:15, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@WaltCip It wouldn't be an issue if I closed this/withdrew this nom and then blanked it yes? Or would I have to wait for this MfD to run its course? I came here from Commons, where the user in question was recently sitebanned and their sandbox deleted for the same reason. :3 F4U (they /it) 15:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Personal attack removed) Blanking the page still leaves it accessable for anyone who wants to go look at it, where deletion wipes it from the net for all but the most dedicated users.

Also, if theres anyone whose graves deserves to be danced on, its nazis and racists. 2603:7000:CF0:7280:58B:3BD4:1DAB:AEB4 (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:POLEMIC, WP:NONAZIS and WP:NORACISTS. We do not need bigotry in userspace, period. — Prodraxis {talk • contributions} (she/her) 03:14, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How does your !vote apply to the page? SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Because bigotry in userspace is just plain problematic, period. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 22:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There’s a section about bigotry, the user appears to be trying to accuse Wikipedia of bigotry. It doesn’t make much sense to me, so maybe I’m missing something. There are signs that the user was unhinged, but I don’t see bigotry itself in this Userpage.

Theres a bit about holocaust denialism, but I’m not sure that it isn’t merely the complaint that the existence of holocaust denialism is under represented in mainspace. That doesn’t sound like a delete requiring opinion. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and Prodraxis, (Personal attack removed)

2603:7000:CF0:7280:58B:3BD4:1DAB:AEB4 (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.