The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Nomination withdrawn; consensus is clear. (non-admin closure) VQuakr (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kmarhef[edit]

WP:NOTWEBHOST. Editor without an edit in the last 7 years came by to spam their blog. VQuakr (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Personally I don't care whether it's kept or deleted however as the link's the main problem here it would make more sense to simply remove the link as opposed to a 7 day discussion on it..... –Davey2010^Talk 19:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per Davey. But also, it's really just a link. Lots of user pages have links to personal websites. I wonder what the threshold is for "you have enough edits that you can have a link to your website"... — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 19:37, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wouldn’t it be more appropriate to speedy under U5 instead of taking it to MFD? Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 01:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Padgriffin: speedy was declined since they have some non-userspace edits, just not recent ones. VQuakr (talk) 02:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Links to user web sites should be blanked. That is not the issue. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.