- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 08:59, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User:Billcurtis33[edit]
- User:Billcurtis33 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
An article in user space about a living person (moved from main space) which has not been edited in over a year. Christian75 (talk) 08:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this is an autobiography as a userpage. Good in userspace, but uncertain as an article. We do not demand that users edit their own user page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:34, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's not a flagrant attempt to advertise himself, in fact it's a sourced article although the sources are primarily primary (ahem) so I'm not suggesting it be moved to mainspace. I cannot see that this violates any rules. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 21:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as stale fake article. If it doesn't belong in main article space, it shouldn't be in userspace either. --Kleinzach 01:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- My interpretation of the rule that userspace "should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content" referred to alternate versions of mainspace articles, to prevent them turning up on Google and being mistaken for the real deal. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 01:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Please delete the page. I have no interest in appearing in Wikipedia. - billcurtis33 99.44.4.184 (talk) 03:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- If you actually logon and say that we can speedy delete the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:12, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete (change of opinion after consideration) - Although I think my point re: usage is fair, the user in question has only made six non-related mainspace contributions, and nothing in over two years. Given this ultra-low editing, the fact that userspace is a privilege and that there is doubt as to how appropriate the content is, I think it is reasonable to delete this page. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 05:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.