The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:.usarnamechoice/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)​

Procedural listing following a DRV at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 December 27. Daniel (talk) 02:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy pings for all involved in the DRV: @.usarnamechoice, @Ad Orientem, @Frank Anchor, @Robert McClenon, @S Marshall, @Hut 8.5, @Nfitz. Daniel (talk) 02:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep: Not G10. Possibly this is NOTWEBHOSTING or POLEMIC. Possibly it is within reasonable leeway, if the user is making constructive edits to related mainspace articles. SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:30, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: at DRV the sentence about cognition was said to require a source, so i added one. .usarnamechoice (talk) 13:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - Not an attack page, and not an obvious BLP violation. I don't like it, and I don't like it is not a reason to delete. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep eh, it’s at least got plenty of citations. Seems like a draft more than a polemic. Dronebogus (talk) 15:20, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.