The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus/default keep. Xoloz 16:31, 21 May 2006 (UTC)))[reply]

Portal:Cannabis[edit]

This portal was rejected at Wikipedia:Portal/Proposals on grounds of bias and because of preference for Portal:Drugs. cj | talk 07:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Question: Then should it be page-blanked and deprecated so we have a record of the decision? It would be nice if others could learn from it rather than making the same mistakes again and again. Rossami (talk) 00:14, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm not quite sure what you mean. It cannot be blanked or deprecated for the same reasons an article cannot be. Furthermore, it has subpages which must in turn be deleted. Also, the decision was not made at the portal. The portal page will be redirected to Portal:Drugs once that is created. Anyone who attempts to recreate it will be duly informed of prior discussion. --cj | talk 09:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. DarthVader 11:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Psychomelodic (people think User:Psychomelodic/me ^edit) 18:37, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. If nothing else, it at does a decent job of organizing cannabis-related articles. It is more culture-related than drug-related, so it doesn't belong under a drug portal. It is terribly biased though. Dave 00:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The objection in this case is not about the content of the portal, but its subject and that's very un-liberal. If anyone wants he can balance the content, this is a free encyclopedia. Psychomelodic (people think User:Psychomelodic/me ^edit) 06:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and/or redirect to Portal:Drugs. Alphax ^τεχ 07:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Such a broad topic and there is still so much to add. michael ^talk 08:00, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.