The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Banksia[edit]

(convenience link: subject article Banksia)

Delete A single plant genus, even one with 170 species, is way too narrow a topic to meet the requirements of the WP:POG guideline. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. Clearly far too narrow to meet the WP:POG requirement that portals should be about "broad subject areas, which are likely to attract large numbers of interested readers and portal maintainers". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:28, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete I agree, it's large in scope in terms of potential article numbers but it's still a niche topic, so small in terms of likelihood to attract interest. I appreciate that's a subjective judgement and am happy to be corrected if there's evidence / substantial weight of opinion that indicates otherwise. Waggers TALK 15:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with prejudice. This is a niche portal and a plague portal. See rationale of nominator. Created in order to increase metrics. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as POG failure. SITH (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.