The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:06, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Aqua Teen Hunger Force[edit]

This one is actually fairly well built, pulling in excerpts from by my count 15 articles between actors, episodes and characters. However the topic fails WP:POG as this is a single TV show, and not even a particularly iconic one as it is on Adult Swim not network TV. Legacypac (talk) 17:36, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - And the reason for a portal for this TV show is ...??? Robert McClenon (talk) 02:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no need or rationale for this. BTW a bunch of those characters no longer have articles--they've been tagged for years. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Automated portal, 0 subpages, created 2018-11-14 02:03:53 by User:Happypillsjr, useless navigation tool, redundant to the existing navboxes, and of lower quality: Portal:Aqua Teen Hunger Force. Pldx1 (talk) 13:58, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Faulty nomination. No prejudice toward nominating separately. Also consider only bundling the newer, automated portals, and omitting the curated ones from this nomination, to perhaps be nominated individually.

Importantly, users may not realize that some portals listed here are curated, instead just assuming that they're all automated. Per WP:PRESERVE, I feel that curated portals should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Many of these portals are based upon major musicians and bands that have significant content about them available on Wikipedia. Two have already been identified in the opinion of the !vote above as meeting WP:POG.-- Happypillsjr ✉ 01:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Happypillsjr: this isn't a bundled nomination? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 01:49, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a faulty keep vote actually. Is ok we all make mistakes. Legacypac (talk) 02:14, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Legacypac Not a faulty vote it's my strong opinion of this portal need to kept, period!-- Happypillsjr ✉ 03:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Happypillsjr: No, but like it is. You meant to post it at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Mixed bag of group portals. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 04:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.