The result of the discussion was: Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:58, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
There's enough here to suggest we're being misused as a clear PR webhost, because this has been deleted and contested before (for example, deleted in last March after existing since August 2015 and contested today), but with no actual changes, and this current Draft hasn't changed from its clear advertising, and the sources then being published and republished advertising, therefore policy WP:NOT certainly applies. When such a blatant advertisement exists for that long but restored after deleted that long ago, and to not improve subsequently while asking for review, is unacceptable because it's still blatant advertising. SwisterTwister talk 00:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)