Consolation of Philosophy

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delist - Consensus is that the article clearly fails 1(a) and (b); 2(b); and 3(a). There may be other issues as well. SilkTork ✔Tea time 23:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article was last checked in 2007, and I do not believe it meets current criteria.

Criterion 2: there are several ((cn)) tags, and yet more material which probably should be ((cn))-ed (e.g. paragraph 1 of Consolation_of_Philosophy#Consolation_of_Philosophy makes numerous unsourced claims about the nature of the text and about contemporary politics: people being 'at the very heights of power' and so on).

Criterion 3: the latter half of Consolation_of_Philosophy#Influence borders on TRIVIA IMO (and many of the statements are unsourced).

Criterion 4: the lack of evidence for tendentious statements about 'horrific' executions, literary influences spreading 'nearly everywhere' and so on makes me doubt how neutral this article is.

It Is Me Here t / c 18:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please notify the most recent GA reviewer. Also, please notify major contributing editors (identifiable through article stats script and relevant WikiProjects for the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done It Is Me Here t / c 11:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, lets see if anyoneresponds. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:18, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]