February 14

File:Virtualinsanityvideo.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Virtualinsanityvideo.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The lorax (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unconvinced that free text couldn't replicate what is seen in this image. Furthermore, I fail to see how the screenshot (of the lead band vocalist in the music video) is contextually significant to the subject of discussion and how deleting the image would (severely) impact readers' grasp of the whole song (and the music video). George Ho (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 08:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Swintonlionslogo2008.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Swintonlionslogo2008.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Urgistics (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Former logo, doesn't significantly enhance the article, so fails WP:NFCC#8. Also violates WP:NFCC#3- minimal number of non-free items in an article, as the current logo suffices Joseph2302 (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not significantly different from the current logo and there is no commentary on its importance in the related article. EdwardUK (talk) 20:55, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TN Jayachandran's Observation.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TN Jayachandran's Observation.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aaroamal (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Easily replaceable by text, and orphaned. Malayalam fonts have existed for a while, and whilst the previous FFD states the image allows those without the appropriate fonts to view it, I don't really understand why we need to specifically cater for those without basic fonts installed at the detriment of functions like copy-paste, easy editing, etc. Pretty sure the reason it's orphaned now is that it was replaced by text. —Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 20:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maj-arch-bishop-mar-thattil.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maj-arch-bishop-mar-thattil.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nidheeshmartin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This is not a free image and is unnecessary to illustrate the subject, with File:Thattill.jpg already in use. ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:47, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emblem Bowser.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem Bowser.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Carlinal (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fair use claim seems to not be logical, as the emblem is not discussed in any meaningful context in the article's reception. It does not illustrate impact, since this is an in-universe emblem not used in any meaningful real world context. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 23:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this was my first attempt to upload something with a fair use license, so I apologize for the roughness. I just took cues from the Rolling Stones logo and applied some of its rationale to here, along with a new purpose parameter. I'm open to further suggestions. Carlinal (talk) 22:25, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.