The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from True Colors (Amphibia) -FASTILY 00:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AnneBoonchuyBlueGemForm.webp (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bmona12 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This non-free image is being used in two articles, True Colors (Amphibia) and Anne Boonchuy. The use in the Anne Boonchuy article is justified, but there is no need for it in the True Colors article which can just reference the Anne Boonchuy article. It's use in Tru Colors does not meet WP:NFCC#8. Recommend Keeping the image for Anne Boonchuy, and remove from True Colors. Whpq (talk) 00:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Replace with File:Amphibia True Colors titlecard.webp on True Colors (Amphibia) due to failing to meet WP:NFCC#8. Keep on Anne Boonchuy. 107.134.86.17 (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The articles of the Gravity Falls episodes also uses non-Title care images, like Dreamscaperers where it has a image of Bill Cipher, so I don't see the point of removing File:AnneBoonchuyBlueGemForm.webp from True Colors (Amphibia). Bmona12 (talk) 02:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's because, unlike Amphibia episodes and most episodes of The Owl House, Gravity Falls does not use title cards. I'm guessing that if Gravity Falls used title cards, those would have been used instead of a still from the episode itself. 107.134.86.17 (talk) 03:57, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shoot, I forgot about that Bmona12 (talk) 05:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Whpq (talk) 01:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Born Pink Digital.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Harobouri (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The "fangs" at the top of the cover art appear to be simple shapes, which cannot be protected by copyright in the United States due to not reaching the required threshold of originality. This file's license should therefore be changed to ((PD-textlogo)) and ((PD-USonly)). 107.134.86.17 (talk) 02:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose per Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 September 2#File:Born Pink Digital.jpeg. Those shapes are quite complex, which can be seen in the high-resolution version of the image. ✗plicit 06:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 01:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coldplay - Don't Panic.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Epbr123 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

A sample lasting twelve seconds especially to comply with MOS:SAMPLE's ten-percent limit is hard to contextually execute in order to help readers understand the whole song. Furthermore, hearing just the chorus/refrain isn't likely helping much. Increasing to fifteen seconds won't help much either. Moreover, the song has two versions by the same band, yet I'm unsure whether more text is necessary to justify using the sample that may not have enough context. More likely fails WP:NFCC#8. George Ho (talk) 05:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep since there is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion passing WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 03:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 06:35, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 01:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:I Need You - Euclid Beach Band.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JGabbard (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The first time I nominated the Dutch cover art last year was primarily based on the assumption that the cover art of and infobox about the 3T version should be part of the top of the article "I Need You (Eric Carmen song)", but it was challenged by the uploader, leading to "no consensus".

This time, I won't challenge (the necessity of) the infobox about the Euclid Beach Band version, but I still don't think a cover art to illustrate a less successful version is necessary. If omitting the cover art won't affect such understanding of the whole song, then the Dutch cover art would fail WP:NFCC#8.

I bet the same can be said about any other edition of the unsuccessful Euclid Beach Band version, one of which I intended to use unless otherwise. George Ho (talk) 06:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:NFCC#3a & WP:NFCC#8 as currently used. The cover of the more famous release is already in the article, and upon reviewing the text of the article, I found no substantial sourced critical commentary/coverage. -FASTILY 00:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nottingham Station tram timetable.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Trammz (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No freedom of panorama for 2D graphic works in the United Kingdom. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:26, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:NutmegOil.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Waitak (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Packaging is likely copyrighted. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:30, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm not mistaken the bottle was manufactured in Indonesia or Malaysia back in the 70s or 80s. I'm inclined to say that it's not under copyright, but as I no longer have access to the bottle, I can't say for sure. Waitak (talk) 01:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 01:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neil Sedaka Oh Carol & One-Way Ticket.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by JoBrLa (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

If displaying just one release is sufficient per WP:NFCC#3a, then this Italian release shall go. Thus, the other image I uploaded, File:Oh Carol by Neil Sedaka US vinyl side-A.png, shall be the lead image of Oh! Carol instead. George Ho (talk) 20:37, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Also fails WP:NFCC#8 as currently used. I've reviewed the text of the article and found no substantial sourced critical commentary/coverage. -FASTILY 00:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.