The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinochestein 3D logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Amitie 10g (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious application of ((PD-shape)). This is not a simple geometric shape, but a complex logo. ✗plicit 01:45, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Also Draft:Pinochestein 3D was deleted as an abandoned draft. Salavat (talk) 14:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rogers Shine-01.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lmcanada (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per c:COM:FOP Canada, freedom of panorama does not extend to 2D works. ✗plicit 01:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morrisons-with-fluid.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ltyore (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image existed at least a month before the original Wikipedia upload date here, which shows a noncommercial Creative Commons license. ✗plicit 02:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-attribute to Manuel Colon MD, RDMS, Jose Cabanas MD @Explicit: Shouldn't we just attribute the file as uploaded to the original physicians on that page, per CC attribution? It definitely isn't public domain, agree with you there. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 23:34, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shah of Iran building two nuclear plants.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Gerash77 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

no source, possible forgery

Delete. No source is given, and others have questioned if this is a forgery.

The original Internet source of this image is iranian.com, 15 May 2006.

However, there is no source given there or here. There are quite a few problems with the picture provided.

1. The "world's first nuclear-generated electricity" was in 1951. So the "30-year safety record" really begins then, not with the founding of the AEC in 1946. The Shah left Iran in January 1979. 1951 + 30 = 1981.
2. I can't find anything on a "vote" for "Pilgrim II", "Pilgrim Unit 2", "Pilgrim 2" and reading the history, it doesn't seem any vote was required. A phone survey or newspaper survey was done, perhaps, but there is no record of a vote.
3. The "New England Gas and Electric Companies" text in bottom right hand corner - the only place this phrase appears (search with quotes) is in reference to this image. It should be "Associates" at the end not "Companies".

The "building two nuclear plants and planning two" dates it (earliest) at November 1974 (Bushehr agreement with Kraftwerk Union) whereas the iranian.com uploader wrote "early 70's".

See Discussion from 2007

"Way to go, submitting news that is at least 20 years old and probably fake. The 30 year safety record could only have come in 1984, which was 5 years after the Shah of Iran was exiled. However, Massachusetts built their third power plant, Yankee Rowe Nuclear Power Station in 1954."

From submitter, 2007:

a friend of mine sent me that particular picture and I believe it was part of an advertising campaign in the early 70's. There is some small print at the bottom that could shine some light on this subject. Cancerward (talk) 05:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:RockNRollTrain.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Igordebraga (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Specific portion of song Rock 'n' Roll Train not proven contextually significant to the whole song, AC/DC article, and Black Ice (album) as a whole. Readers reading the album would already know about the the album's musical style, and I'm unconvinced whether the sample is necessary there. Same for other articles, including the song article. Unsure why "guitar riffs and elemental drum beats" and "backing vocal harmony" is perceived as inadequately without the sample. Furthermore, readers reading the band article would already know AC/DC as a rock bank, and I don't think the song portion would make any difference to them. But I can stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 06:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thedarkchannel new1png.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dee' (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Although the uploader appears to be the author and has attached a free license, the description suggests the image can only be used non-commercially. Image is not used anywhere; article about subject was deleted. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thedarkchannel new2png.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Dee' (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused screenshot of non-notable website, article about subject was deleted. See also the FfD for related file File:Thedarkchannel new1png.PNG. Ixfd64 (talk) 06:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:55, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dallas Green and Jubella the Wikipedian.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jubella (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

PRODed this but template was removed. Selfie with a notable individual does not make an image useful. Removed from userpage by uploader as well. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cc. @Explicit: --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Selfie with a notable subject, clear encyclopedic use. This photo is much better quality than File:DallasGreenEdge2005.JPG, which is currently used in Dallas Green (musician) in the relevant section. The image can be cropped and transferred to Commons. ✗plicit 00:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Wouldn't mind cropping. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:21, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Upon looking at the file again, the photo kinda looks like it was taken by someone and not a selfie per se (hand not extended, etc.). Much better alternatives on commons if a swap is needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:22, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Lack of use is not a reason to delete own work file. Wouldn't mind transferring to Commons. Neocorelight (Talk) 10:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herald1976.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rustyproof (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low res, near duplicate of File:Herald 1976.jpg. Other file was uploaded shortly after this so it can be assumed that this file has been superseded by File:Herald 1976.jpg --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to other JPG file. Salavat (talk) 14:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Back In Black sample.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TonyTheTiger (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Sample de-PRODded under assumption that the article has enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion. This is of the chorus/refrain. I added two other samples: an instrumental guitar riff I uploaded in MP3 format, and the first verse I moved from the AC/DC article. Either the chorus/refrain portion is supported by critical commentary, or it doesn't. Furthermore, the portion may be easily conveyed in text. George Ho (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:ACDC - Back In Black-sample.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Raftacon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

I moved the sample of the first verse from the AC/DC article to Back in Black (song), thinking that the band article can already convey info about the band itself without the samples. I also thought the song article already summarizes what the lyrics are about. However, I'm torn, but I have no objections to deleting the "first verse" portion. Just now, I uploaded the opening guitar riff portion in MP3 format (which I've not yet nominated), thinking that it's necessary to convey what its guitar riff sounds like without the lyrics around. George Ho (talk) 21:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cher - Where Do You Go.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alecsdaniel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Recently removed the sample from the album article The Sonny Side of Cher. I still don't think the portion heard in the sample is contextually significant to Where Do You Go (Cher song) as a whole or the whole album, even when trimmed. George Ho (talk) 23:20, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cher- Bang Bang My Baby Shot Me Down.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Alecsdaniel (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Recently removed the sample from the album article The Sonny Side of Cher. Even when the song is familiar and recognizable, and even when trimmed, I still don't think the portion heard in the sample is contextually significant to Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down) as a whole or to the whole album. George Ho (talk) 23:22, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.