The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:RomanianPassportVisaFree.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Groubani (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Support deletion: unused raster image that was not used to create the corresponding vector image and thus is not needed for attribution purposes HouseBlaster^talk 00:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 15:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anti Aircraft Command formation Patch.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cunobeline (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anti Aircraft Command formation Patch.gif Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:29, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:1924 Turkish champions Harbiye.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Akocsg (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:1924 Türkiye şampiyonu Harbiye takımı.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 01:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dentaku Kraftwerk cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TwentytwoAug (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Non-free Japanese version of a cover. Claimed to be used for primary identification but is not in the infobox. And the cover image is very similar to the cover already in the infobox. Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a. Whpq (talk) 03:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Stifle (talk) 11:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kraftwerk Pocket Calculator excerpt.mp3 (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TwentytwoAug (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This song sample is stated to be be "For taking an example of this song". That's not an actual purpose. As used, there is no significant sourced commentary to justify the inclusion of this sample. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 03:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Quat2005.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Angmering (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Actor Jason Flemyng portrayed the titular character in only the 2005 remake of The Quatermass Experiment. The actor hasn't made any subsequent appearances as the character to this date. Furthermore, prior actors portrayed the same character. I don't think the screenshot of the actor is any longer contextually significant to the character in question. Furthermore, there are free images of Flemyng (in case this screenshot gets deleted) and another actor Brian Donlevy, one of which I'll use soon. George Ho (talk) 03:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC); edited, 03:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Having second thoughts about the Flemyng image in Commons. That still doesn't ease my concerns about the screenshot. George Ho (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mark R. Hughes.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smtchahal (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Per the description, uploaded 10 years ago from http://www.nndb.com/people/641/000103332/ which is Copyright ©2019 Soylent Communications and not CCA-SA 3.0 Stephen 05:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a copyright violation. Checking the wayback machine for archives from before and just after the date of upload shows no signs of any sort of Creative Commons licensing. -- Whpq (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Don't know or remember why I uploaded it the way I did 10 years ago. The source webpage hasn't really changed much since then; the copyright notice (and lack of a license) was always there. Smtchahal (talk) 16:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 18. ✗plicit 12:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tony Toni Tone - If I Had No Loot.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:02, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Society of the Spectacle film.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by George Ho (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploaded the title card in 2013 as non-free. Recently changed the status to "PD-ineligible-USonly": screenshot has plain black background, text unoriginal, typeface well known and not complex. Unsure whether French law can consider the title card copyrightable (c:COM:France). If not, then transfer the title card to Commons. George Ho (talk) 09:37, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except [[[Man in the Box]] -FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Man in the Box - Alice in Chains.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Blz 2049 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The sample's compliance with NFCC, especially "contextual significance", in the following articles must be evaluated: Alice in Chains, Alternative metal, Facelift (album), Man in the Box. Critical commentary to support it is insufficient in band, genre, and album articles, which may have enough text to convey their own topics without the sample. Unsure whether critical commentary is sufficient in the (main) song article. Just in case, I default to deciding that the song article can convey the understanding of the song without the sample, but I can stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 07:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep in the song article because there is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion. Aspects (talk) 23:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:41, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2022 February 25. MBisanz ^talk 01:25, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Middle of the Road UK single cover.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Remove from all except Come as You Are (Nirvana song) -FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Come As You Are (Nirvana song - sample).ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TUF-KAT (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Currently used in American popular music, Come as You Are (Nirvana song), and Nevermind. The genre article uses several samples, and I'm unsure whether the sample of Nirvana's "Come As You Are" is contextually significant to the US pop music genre. I'm unsure as well about its usage in the album article. I think the sample can belong in the song article as it possibly illustrates critical commentary there, but I can stand corrected. George Ho (talk) 07:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep in the song article since there vis enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion there. Aspects (talk) 23:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Inga2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ASutton13 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Cropped from somewhere. Source/permission needed. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - no convincing argument for deletion. Yes, it's obvious there's been a crop, but this is a photo from a high school prom. The other people in the fuller image are irrelevant and so them being cropped out makes prfect sense. -- Whpq (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Inga Skaya article was deleted in 2020. Salavat (talk) 06:22, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The photo is within the scope of Commons so it can be transferred there. Skaya is a Miss Universe Canada titleholder and so the image could be conceivably used in that or related articles either on the English or other language Wikipedias. -- Whpq (talk) 21:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. The offending portions were cropped out in File:Iain Pyman winner of the Tusker Kenya Open March 2008 (cropped).jpg -FASTILY 07:34, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iain PYMAN winner of the Tusker Kenya Open March 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CreativeAkili (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The pictured trophy is likely subject to copyright and not considered de minimis. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I'm not convinvced about deminimus, but regardless, the photo could be cropped to deal with any issue of the trophy. The image would be a good addition to our article on Iain Pyman. -- Whpq (talk) 19:12, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note - I have uploaded a version of the file with both the picture credits bit and trophy cropped out here and have added it to Iain Pyman. Not going to !vote because I am honestly unsure what needs to happen here - I agree that the trophy is highly unlikely to be considered de minimis (it is in the foreground and being held up to the camera by Pyman). While this image is under copyright, it is also needed for attribution purposes. HouseBlaster^talk 20:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sleeping beauties 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Belovedfreak (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Readers can see in the screenshot a woman standing and another woman lying unconscious. However, the scene can be easily conveyed in text. Also, it doesn't help readers contextually understand the short film as a whole. Just now, I added the film's title card intended for an infobox, so I pushed this longstanding screenshot out into the body of the article. However, I still don't think it improves justification of using the screenshot. Image de-PRODded under assumption that screenshots are acceptable for use in Template:Infobox film. However, the infobox instructions doesn't mention any specific screenshot other than a title card, which can be used when an authentic poster or cover art is absent or nonexistent. Neither does WP:FILMPOSTER nor WP:FILMNFI. May likely be not contextually significant. George Ho (talk) 23:32, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.