December 10
File:Qinling Huaihe Line.png
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 15:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Qinling Huaihe Line.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Notthebestusername (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
As per c:COM:CHINA, Chinese government works are not in public domain. The map is likely copyrighted and not suitable for WikiCommons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:39, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Apparently, there exists c:Template:PD-PRC-exempt since their copyright law was amended in 2020. Nevertheless this image file seems not eligible as it doesn't fall among three categories of public domain works of Chinese government: "(1) laws; regulations; resolutions, decisions and orders of state organs; other documents of legislative, administrative and judicial nature; and their official translations; (2) mere information about facts or happenings; and (3) calendars, numerical tables, forms of general use and formulas." Nothing mentioned about maps or cartography. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Whpq (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Its All Coming Back To Me Now - Meat Loaf video.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The JPS (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Not proven yet as contextually significant to Bat Out of Hell III: The Monster Is Loose and It's All Coming Back to Me Now. Shows two artists in a music video, but justification for use in those articles unclear as of date. No objections to deletion. George Ho (talk) 09:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC); expanded, 09:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep since there is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion. Aspects (talk) 22:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- In which article? George Ho (talk) 22:59, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:10, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 13:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:My Prerogative-Britney Spears music video.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 15:08, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- File:My Prerogative-Britney Spears music video.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Xwomanizerx (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Shows Britney Spears dancing/performing on a Porsche within a pool. I appreciate the illustration, but I am uncertain whether the screenshot is necessary and whether deleting it would affect how the subject of discussion is understood. I.e. I don't know how and why it is contextually significant to the song. Default to delete if no one objects. George Ho (talk) 02:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep since there is enough critical commentary to justify its inclusion. Aspects (talk) 22:56, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:13, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Whpq (talk) 13:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing in the image that can't be conveyed in text (which it already is) and it's a terrible quality image which doesn't help understanding anyway. Fails NFCC8. Black Kite (talk) 19:13, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Aethiopes by billy woods.jpg
