The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 4. (non-admin closure) — Coolperson177 (t|c) 02:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Go All the Way.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bu Liao Qing.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Moon Represents My Heart - Teresa Teng.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kirsten Tucker 2007 Broadway.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Superdupereditor (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unlikely to be the uploader's own work due to low resolution and lack of data. A higher-resolution version could be found at another website. [1] Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elvis Costello Ticket Stub 1987-04-30 Easton.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chicagoish (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

No indication of free license at source website, not sure whether ((PD-art)) is applicable. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Etherialbeings.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nadyes (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low-quality screen grab from copyrighted film Knowing. Only used on user page. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I have changed the copyright tag to ((Non-free film screenshot)), but the image is currently orphaned in the mainspace so it can't be kept. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Even if this is acceptable under a free license (which I doubt), there's no source information provided at all to verify its copyright status. The uploader hasn't edited since September 2011 which means it seems highly unlikely they're going to comment here in this FFD. It would've probably be better to tag the file with ((nsd)) per WP:F4 or ((npd)) per WP:F11 instead of discussing it here. Now, since the file has been relicensed as non-free, it's also eligible for speedy deletion per WP:F5 and WP:F6. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:10, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parano song shoot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Physcho711 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused album cover, no evidence uploader is copyright holder. Album and artist do not appear to be notable. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:40, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: If you are the copyright holder, please follow this procedure to get the file restored -FASTILY 02:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parish Map Georgeham.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jack1956 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Original art is likely copyrighted. I'm not sure it qualifies for fair use as the parent article already contains numerous images. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I spoke to the parish priest at the time I took the photo. He said there was no copyright and the tapestry was freely available for photographing Jack1956 (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether the priest should send permission statement to OTRS to verify the status. George Ho (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Freely available for photographing" is not the same as allowing said photographs to be published under a free license. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:34, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, but “no copyright” does. Dreamspy (talk) 07:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rev. James M. Cesta.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Astro5665 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Seems to be a photograph of a photograph in a frame. No evidence uploader owns the copyright to the original. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete File:WYDLMD2.jpg -FASTILY 02:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:WYDLMD1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sweetiepetie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File:WYDLMD2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sweetiepetie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Both currently used at Don't Let Me Down (Will Young song) and You and I (Will Young song). If using both still violates WP:NFCC#3a and/or WP:NFCC#8, then one of them should be kept. No preference on either; for now, defaulting to prefer the CD1 single, i.e. just a single photo of Young, over the CD2 single with a bunch of photos of him there. George Ho (talk) 23:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.