The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Unclear copyright status. No prejudice to restoration if someone can demonstrate that the file is actually available under a Wikipedia-compatiable license -FASTILY 02:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:First Term of the Council of Experts.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ali313korosh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This image is claimed to be licensed under a Creative Commons license but there is no such license at the source page. The source page does state "All rights of this site belong to Mashreq News news-analytical site and the use of its contents is unrestricted by mentioning the source" (as translated from Persian by Google translation). Is this considered freely licensed? Whpq (talk) 01:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ayatollah Hasan Ali Nejabat Shirazi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ali313korosh (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious sourcing and licensing. The image is sourced to a Persian language wiki and may possibly be a mirror or partial mirror of Wikipedia. The subject (Hasan Ali Nejabat Shirazi) is deceased so it might be possible to convert to non-free usage if a proper source can be established. The Persian Wikipedia artile on the subject has no photo and a review of the history shows that a photo was removed after deletion. It might be that this photo was originally mirrored from Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 02:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reedbank.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Notthebestusername (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Probably not a "100% own work" (copyright-related). TinEye detects several similar images, one of them dates back to April 12, 2008 (http://forum.vncnus.net/viewtopic.php?t=10802&highlight=, exact image: https://legacy.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/paracel_spratly_88.jpg). Most likely the "base map" was cropped to focus on Recto/Reed Bank and added some labels. The file description page itself lacks details and information about source and authorship. Additionally, there seems to be no explicit indication that "lib.utexas.edu" agreed to license the derivative work under CC licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Clearly a derivative work with no indication that the original work was freely licensed. -- Whpq (talk) 12:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tampahartline.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Azumanga1 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fair use rationale invalid on the only page on which it's used, as File:HART_logo.png is used there (in the infobox). YorkshireLad  ✿  ^(talk) 16:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamsaar Pathans.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by The King 70861 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Collage with muddled sourcing. It's unclear what image came from what book. We would need more evidence that these books are freely licensed or more likely where the books sourced the images from. Although the uploader may have created the collage, the copyright on the individual elements are very unclear. Whpq (talk) 19:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.