The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aaronpenaathouse.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shainelee (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

While the linked blog is indeed licensed Creative Commons, it contains various photos of Aaron Peña which he couldn't have taken himself as well as an illustration of horses which he probably didn't create himself. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aaronpena.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Shainelee (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

While the linked blog is indeed licensed Creative Commons, it contains various photos of Aaron Peña which he couldn't have taken himself as well as an illustration of horses which he probably didn't create himself. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 10:35, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:RobertZak.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PennyMaddox (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Uploader is asserting they are the copyright holder for this publicity photo. The photo has been used here, and also is the subject's LinkedIn profile image. The EXIF indicates this image is from Facebook related site. OTRS confirmation of copyright would be needed. Whpq (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless the copyright holder contacts OTRS. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 13:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Weeknd - Die for You.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by H9v9n9 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The source for this file is given as blakmusic.fr. I don't think this is a reliable source, it has a leak preview page which looks very unprofessional. A reverse image search does not turn up any primary source connected to the Weeknd or XO. NØ 15:20, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The artwork that the user uploaded is unofficial and is akin to the popular (and unofficial) cover of "Reminder" that use to heavily circulate around the internet in 2017. -- DovahDuck (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 12:46, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Man's sajda.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hadysylmy (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Probably copyright-violating (derivative?) work. Compare for example with this image from five years ago. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:43, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless the uploader clarifies the copyright status of the image, because this file is clearly from the linked image in this nomination. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 20:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Claim of being own work is highly dubious. This image is used on a multitude of websites including versions where the image is reversed like here. -- Whpq (talk) 21:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:06, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Show Me the Way cover 1975.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rlendog (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Part of previous FFD discussion that was closed in a procedural way due to my not stating which part of NFCC it violates. I'm re-nominating this individual image this time, saying that it fails both WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. The live version release charted more successfully, while the original studio version either was not listed in charts or didn't perform well. I think the song article would do fine without this 1975 sleeve. George Ho (talk) 22:30, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.