The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Suberoyl chloride.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Non-Lurker (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not large, but jagged. Have File:Suberoyl-chloride-2D-skeletal.png on commons that is as MOS:CHEM quality and also matches orientation of File:Suberoyl-chloride-3D-balls.png. I replaced it in suberoyl chloride, so it's orphaned (if we sent it to commons, it would likely be promptly deleted as inferior to the one I note). DMacks (talk) 00:00, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 04:02, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glutaryl chloride.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Non-Lurker (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Not large, but jagged. Have File:Glutaryl-chloride-2D-skeletal.png on commons that is as MOS:CHEM quality and also draws this symmetric molecule more symmetrically. I replaced it in glutaryl chloride, so it's orphaned (if we sent it to commons, it would likely be promptly deleted as inferior to the one I note). DMacks (talk) 00:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 04:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 July 16. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Initial D Logo.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Epitalon structure pubchem.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Isol9 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Replaced by File:Epitalon.png on commons that is drawn from scratch to MOS instead of copy-pasted from low-graphical-quality source. DMacks (talk) 00:29, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 04:03, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 July 16. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:11, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Modern Mongol calligraphy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Probably eligible for WP:CSD#G7 if SlimVirgin wants to get rid of it. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sick men's ward and torture instruments in the Marshalsea.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SlimVirgin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Unused since 2016. -- CptViraj (📧) 11:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would have proposed moving to Commons, but the two halves of this image are already available there. One half without a significant loss of quality (for my eyes), and one even has an additional version with a higher resolution. Hans Adler 04:17, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• It's tagged as ((Keep local)) by User:SlimVirgin who uploaded it here on en.wp. Seems like this could have been handled informally, since SlimVirgin is an active admin here and could explain a reason or handle the transwiki or simply delete if no longer needed for whatever their KeepLocal purpose was. Given there's no licensing or other policy reason to delete, I !vote Keep (unless uploader decides differently) because the uploader, a long-term editor in good standing who contributes substantial article content, requests it that way and could plausibly be working on any number of encyclopediac projects here that involve it. DMacks (talk) 12:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Ah, sorry, I missed that. In that case I agree with you and Risker, to keep and ask SV. Hans Adler 05:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per DMacks with the same proviso. Many experienced Wikipedians have seen files deleted, inappropriately altered, or overwritten on Commons, which is the usual reason for the KeepLocal additions. Risker (talk) 02:16, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.