The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Black ICE\White Noise#Audio. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, so there's really no justification of its non-free use. Finally, the album cover is basically the same as File:Black Ice, White Noise cover art.jpg, so there is also no justification for non-free use per WP:NFCC#3a. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:00, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Was F4, but was told that was the wrong approach for older uploads which may actually be own work. The concern here is that what's shown is a 2D sign. Is the stylised A simple enough to be below the threshold of originality? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Image is from a user-authored image site - https://mushroomobserver.org/image/show_image/64347 - where users can pick a license at upload. (The CC at the bottom is not just a blanket statement for the site - it means that it was picked for this image in particular - their terms of use say that users are given the option to pick a license and, indeed, from clicking around I found an image with a non-commercial license.) But this image has emblazened on it "(c) D.D.K 11-09-09 all rights reserved". So do we accept the license as valid? B (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Claim of own work is not credible. This is obviously a professional photo shoot for an actor. A different crop / colouring of the image appears on the actor's facebook page wwith a posting date of June 12, 2016 which predates this upload. Whpq (talk) 13:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8 in Subrat Dutta. Stefan2 (talk) 15:25, 26 September 2018 (UTC)