June 4
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Samovar boiler.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rajasekharan Parameswaran (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It is not being used on any article here. Perhaps it is best used in Wikimedia, since the object is the uploader's own as mentioned in the FUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:19, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:00, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - As it is, the image is watermarked all over with the uploader's name. This is not suitable for use in articles or in Commons. -- Whpq (talk) 17:27, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WATERMARK. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 17:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WATERMARK --DBigXray 15:00, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:WHEEL HUB-Royal Enfield Motorcycle 1961.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WHEEL HUB-Royal Enfield Motorcycle 1961.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rajasekharan Parameswaran (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It is not being used on any article here. Perhaps it is best used in Wikimedia, since the object is the uploader's own as mentioned in the FUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Royal Enfield Motorcycle 1961.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Royal Enfield Motorcycle 1961.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rajasekharan Parameswaran (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It is not being used on any article here. Perhaps it is best used in Wikimedia, since the object is the uploader's own as mentioned in the FUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:OIL CAP -Royal Enfield Motorcycle 1961.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:OIL CAP -Royal Enfield Motorcycle 1961.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rajasekharan Parameswaran (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
It is not being used on any article here. Perhaps it is best used in Wikimedia, since the object is the uploader's own as mentioned in the FUR. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Charles Millican portrait.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 12. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Charles Millican portrait.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2018 June 12. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:25, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Glenn Dumke.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:P&H overhead bridge crane circa 1888.jpg
File:Rishi Samadhiya 2.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rishi Samadhiya 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Samrishi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File not being used in any constructive way. It may have some value being hosted on Commons, since it is the uploader's own. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WATERMARK watermark appears to be promotional as well. --DBigXray 15:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rishi Samadhiya 1.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rishi Samadhiya 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Samrishi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File not being used in any constructive way. It may have some value being hosted on Commons, since it is the uploader's own. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:00, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WATERMARK watermark appears to be promotional as well. --DBigXray 15:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rishi Samadhiya 5.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rishi Samadhiya 5.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Samrishi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File not being used in any constructive way. It may have some value being hosted on Commons, since it is the uploader's own. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:02, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WATERMARK watermark appears to be promotional as well. --DBigXray 15:18, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Rishi Samadhiya.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rishi Samadhiya.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Samrishi (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File not being used in any constructive way. It may have some value being hosted on Commons, since it is the uploader's own. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WATERMARK watermark appears to be promotional as well. --DBigXray 15:17, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:HIGHFIELD, NSW, Australia.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relicense as PD-1923. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:29, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- File:HIGHFIELD, NSW, Australia.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cintac10 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
License needs to be clarified: the uploader has selected a CC-BY-SA license, but the summary text says the Shire Council allows only non-commercial use. John of Reading (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and change tag. According to this page, it is a postcard from between 1900-1910, and so would be in the public domain in both AU and US. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Tomb of Pope Adrian V.jpg
File:Tomb of Pope Clement IV.jpg
File:50 years of Cyta.jpg