The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
derivative of non-free content; there is no FOP for 3D works in the Philippines FASTILY 00:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
unused, dubious self-work claim/ derivative of non-free content (cover) FASTILY 00:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
License conflict, as this is an extant disease it likely wouldn't meet the irreplaceability requirements of NFCC if kept non-free. – Train2104 (t • c) 00:14, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
unused, low-res, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 00:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
unused, superseded by File:Nicolae Testemitanu Medal1.png FASTILY 00:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 00:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
unused, blurry, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 00:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image, low-res, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 02:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
possible derivative of non-free content (photographs) FASTILY 02:16, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 September 20. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
No indication uploader is the creator of the logo shown. Also a source is lacking to confirm the screenshot and logo is covered by the license provided. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
I am sure the uploader meant to indicate this was under the Apache license. However whilst the photo may well be own work, there's no indication as to who the authors of software (such as the distribution etc.) are. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
There's no confirmation as to the GPL status of the logo provided on the included source link. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
I am sure the uploader meant to indicate portions of this image were under the Apache license. However they've claimed own work on the source field, In respect of their photo this is correct, but the image contains third-party material for which no source/author information appears to have been provided. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
A screenshot of third-party software is not "own work" as claimed. There's also two information summaries which conflict.
Also whilst I'm sure the intent was to say the screenshot contained portions under the Apache license, the template used doesn't do this , and so as such this has no license on a technicality. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:45, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
No indication of GPL status on given source. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
No indication of claimed license on given source. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
No indication of given license at direct source given. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Authorship/source of distribution not detailed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Lacks information as to the source/authorship of the distribution of GPL software shown. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn, All the linked source repository seem to contain a COPYING file consistent with GPL licensing, and this is GNOME related, so it seem reasonable to assume that the version here would be licensed the same way. If someone wanted to query the Windows 8 UI elements shown, fair enough, but that's a different FFD.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Although a link to a source is provided, there's no direct indication of GPL status on the source directly listed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:53, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Direct link to image, no source provided that confirms GPL status of software shown. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Direct source given, does not confirm GPL status, or link to appropriate COPYING file containing the relevant GPL version. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:20, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
No source provided that would confirm GPL status of software shown, nor is a link to the relevant COPYING file containing the appropriate GPL version provided. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Withdrawn - File information was updated. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:13, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Appears to just have been taken from the website post by "Murali Ande" with no indication they are the same as up loader http://templesamazingandhistoricalplaces.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/waadapalli-great-shiva-temple-bus-from.html KylieTastic (talk) 14:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
superseded by File:Flag of Russia.svg, otherwise unused Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
unused, superseded by File:Arching action in laterally restrained slab.svg FASTILY 19:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
The source URL doesn't reveal when the photo was first published (as required by the copyright tag). The URL doesn't even reveal when the photo was taken. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:02, 10 September 2017 (UTC)