The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:J. McWatters head shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by AW at PACA (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

So this one is a little weird. Normally, official photos of federal employees are taken by other federal employees in the course of their duties. Therefore, falling under a PD-USGov license. At first glance, this one appears to be fine. However, looking at the EXIF metadata gives a different impression. The author is listed as Steven Halperson of tisaraphoto.com (they are the owner per their LinkedIn profile). It doesn't appear that they are a federal employee nor are subject to the same PD rules as federal employees. I'll send them an email just to be sure but I wanted to bring this here to kill two birds with one stone. Majora (talk) 02:45, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The federal government does sometimes use images made by third parties. These third parties don't seem to lose their own (copy)rights so these images would be non-free. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:07, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did receive an email back from the photographer. They gave publication rights to the NCUA. They did not transfer copyright over to them. When I asked if they would be willing to release the photo to us under a creative commons license I never heard back. So at this point, with it being here for over a week I'm going to have to regretfully default to a precautionary delete position. --Majora (talk) 20:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thailand-iran-stamp-2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bussaco (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Thai stamps are copyrighted for a term of 50 years, this stamp appears to have been issued in 2006. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 12:39, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 01:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.