< December 21 December 23 >

December 22

File:Hostelman.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 00:59, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hostelman.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hostelman (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Delete This picture should be deleted because it was uploaded for a now-deleted article of a non-notable company by a member of said company that was used to promote and advertise said company. The person who uploaded the picture is now blocked for spam and advertising. User:Kerl126 (talk) (contributions) 00:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dan Onorato 2008 crop.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2017 December 30. Killiondude (talk) 08:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan Onorato 2008 crop.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Dan Onorato.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Maggie Toulouse Oliver.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Sen Mimi Stewart.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Sheffield Nelson 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
File:Tim Keller.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PLaSM Sample Geometry2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 01:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:PLaSM Sample Geometry2.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PavelSolin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The software creator licenses images created by their software under CC-BY-SA, but there's likely a separate copyright owned by whoever actually created this image. We have no license from them. ~ Rob13Talk 16:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viewtron news screen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 01:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viewtron news screen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pantser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious copyright status. While Flickr has this as CC-BY-SA 2.0, there's no actual evidence that the copyright holder of this graphical interface has actually released it under any free license. Indeed, this technology was long-dead by the time CC-BY-SA 2.0 was released. ~ Rob13Talk 16:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viewtron JC Penney catalog screen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viewtron JC Penney catalog screen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pantser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious copyright status. While Flickr has this as CC-BY-SA 2.0, there's no actual evidence that the copyright holder of this graphical interface has actually released it under any free license. Indeed, this technology was long-dead by the time CC-BY-SA 2.0 was released. ~ Rob13Talk 16:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viewtron Consumer Reports screen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Killiondude (talk) 08:16, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viewtron Consumer Reports screen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pantser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious copyright status. While Flickr has this as CC-BY-SA 2.0, there's no actual evidence that the copyright holder of this graphical interface has actually released it under any free license. Indeed, this technology was long-dead by the time CC-BY-SA 2.0 was released. ~ Rob13Talk 16:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viewtron weather map.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 01:00, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viewtron weather map.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pantser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious copyright status. While Flickr has this as CC-BY-SA 2.0, there's no actual evidence that the copyright holder of this graphical interface has actually released it under any free license. Indeed, this technology was long-dead by the time CC-BY-SA 2.0 was released. ~ Rob13Talk 16:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viewtron bulletin board.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 01:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viewtron bulletin board.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pantser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious copyright status. While Flickr has this as CC-BY-SA 2.0, there's no actual evidence that the copyright holder of this graphical interface has actually released it under any free license. Indeed, this technology was long-dead by the time CC-BY-SA 2.0 was released. ~ Rob13Talk 16:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viewtron business news.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 01:01, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viewtron business news.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pantser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious copyright status. While Flickr has this as CC-BY-SA 2.0, there's no actual evidence that the copyright holder of this graphical interface has actually released it under any free license. Indeed, this technology was long-dead by the time CC-BY-SA 2.0 was released. ~ Rob13Talk 16:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Viewtron Grolier encyclopedia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 01:08, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viewtron Grolier encyclopedia.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pantser (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious copyright status. While Flickr has this as CC-BY-SA 2.0, there's no actual evidence that the copyright holder of this graphical interface has actually released it under any free license. Indeed, this technology was long-dead by the time CC-BY-SA 2.0 was released. ~ Rob13Talk 16:21, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:James B Colgate prior to the 1916 storm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz talk 01:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:James B Colgate prior to the 1916 storm.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LittleGreenLights (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Was tagged for deletion for lack of source. Notice deleted with comment "image is pre-1916". That is true, however US copyright status is based on date of publication, not date of creation and without a source or other information it is not possible to determine if this image is PD. Nthep (talk) 18:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.