The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:08, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:DD985crest.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Durin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, superseded by File:USS Cushing (DD-985) crest.png FASTILY 06:11, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 00:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:USMC Tiara.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Chetsford (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Photo is from the Smithsonian website, which gives a noncommercial license to its content.[1] Kelly ^hi! 08:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that, as a component of the U.S. Government, nothing produced by the Smithsonian (separate from those things held by it but not produced by it), were protected by copyright regardless of its claims to the contrary, but I am not an expert on the matter so will defer to Kelly and the community for guidance without objection. I apologize for any uploading error I've made. Chetsford (talk) 08:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the Smithsonian's copryrights page, I think we'd need a FUR to use it here. I think that should not be a problem. How about something along these lines:

=== Fair use in Military tiara ===

Though this image is subject to copyright, its use is covered by the U.S. fair use laws, and the stricter requirements of Wikipedia's non-free content policies, because:

1. It illustrates an educational article about military history.
2. The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article topic.
3. It is a low resolution image, and thus not suitable for production of counterfeit goods.
4. The image is not used in such a way that a reader would be confused into believing that the article is written or authorized by the owner of the image.
5. is not replaceable with an uncopyrighted or freely copyrighted image of comparable educational value.

Add attribution/source.

Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 21:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't believe it could be justified under WP:NFCC#1 as the tiara still exists (and possibly others) and a free image could be made or obtained. Kelly ^hi! 07:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Obvious case of ((PD-USGov-SI)). This reminds me of when the White House photographer for the Obama administration put all sorts of crazy restrictions on the official White House Flickr account. The images were still public domain. We follow U.S. law, not the mistakes of whoever put up the Smithsonian Website. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:31, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - as above; if you want to play it "double-safe", fill out a "fair use" form as well. but it is & & should be pd us gov. Lx 121 (talk) 10:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dianthus-plumarius.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kazvorpal (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Stated license is apparently Non-Commercial in text, but SA in license tag. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:07, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Donald Trump Jr. - Rob Goldstone e-mail chain.pdf (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jasonanaggie (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Is this really fair use, giving an entire 5 page document of nominally copyright content? If this was submitted as evidence in a court proceeding I'd be less unhappy, but the rationale presented doesn't explain if these were. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. An excerpt or two could be justified as fair use, but not the whole document. Kelly ^hi! 12:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Can be described with text alone, either by summarizing or quoting the content. The appearance of the printout is not significant for discussion. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:25, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Go World Issue 59.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cloudeight (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Querying Non-free status on the basis that's what shown appears to be ancient, and the additional magazine content is only text. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to ((PD-old)). (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 00:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sebastiano Serlio Image.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lamro (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Querying this on the basis that it looks older enough to query the non-free status? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:17, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The image dates to 1830, so I'd say it's safe to tag as being in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:White label space rover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bartox (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

copyvio from here. -Nizil (talk) 13:20, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Central FC 2012-13 Team Photo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Laman012 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Copyvio. Given the edit history of the uploader it is highly unlikely that he flew to T&T and had this team pose for him. And indeed, the photo is from the club's Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/CentralFCTT/photos/a.494827860545892.126915.494826560546022/531611760200835/?type=3&theater Grueslayer 15:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jay Kings Mom - Peaches.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jay A King (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Apparent screenshot. – Train2104 (t • c) 22:53, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.