< November 17	November 19 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Samsung Series 4 "50 PDP.JPG Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:53, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. Article already has a non-free image in infobox. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails MOS:FILM#Soundtrack and WP:NFCC#8. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. Two articles using this image already have other non-free images in infobox. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:44, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. Article already has many non-free images. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:48, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. Article already has a non-free image of Spinner along with a free image from Commons too. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:03, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 12#File:Brideoffrankenstein.jpg))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 18:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 with no contextual significance and its omission would not be detrimental to understanding. The image was not present at the time of FA review of the article and thus not discussed. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

comment While this specific image wasn't discussed, the 2007 FA discussion did include a specific request for images of actors in costume. A comment from the nominator indicates six were added at that time, but they were removed at some later point. I have posted a link to this discussion on the article talk page. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of standards have changed in the last decade. At a minimum, any illustration of "characters" needs to have a valid fair use rationale czar 18:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to USonly, in light of lack of info on Danish TOO czar 18:43, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should this file be converted from ((Non-free logo)) to ((PD-logo)) or ((PD-USonly))? It is currently being used in three articles, but only has a non-free use rationale for Technical University of Denmark. It's been tagged with ((di-missing some article links)) for Center for Electron Nanoscopy since February 2011, and it also does not have a rationale for DTU Space. If the licensing can be converted to public domain, then WP:NFCCP (No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI) will not be applicable; on the other hand, if it needs to be non-free then valid rationales need to be added or the file needs to be removed per WP:NFCCE -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:59, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Change licensing to "PD-USonly as image appears to be below the threshold of originality. Commons does touch on Denmark in their threshold of originality article but its not very clear regarding logos. Salavat (talk) 04:06, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to pd-logo czar 18:48, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free files being used in Towamencin Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania#Education as well as North Penn School District and Christopher Dock Mennonite High School. The usage in the subsection of the township's article is clearly decorative and does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. If, however, these are considered to be too simple for copyright protect and their licensing can be converted to ((PD-logo)), then WP:NFCC#8 would not apply and they could remain as is. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Both images appear to be below the threshold of originality. Suggest changing the licensing to "PD-logo". Both logos could qualify to be copied over to Commons following the change. Salavat (talk) 04:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 18:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike what the license tag says, this image is not a screenshot of a Microsoft product. Rather, it is an image that Microsoft used, most likely under fair use provisions and the copyright belongs to someone else. Furthermore, this image can be plausibly replaced by a free image. (WP:NFCC#1.) There is a Windows Store app called "Wikipedia UWP". Any screenshot of this app would be counted as free contents. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:43, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Considered ineligible at Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete local copy in favour of Commons copy. Image licensing changed to PD-logo and replaced on the article with the Commons version. Salavat (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons considered this to be an expired HK copyright. - Commons:File:Woo Pak-foo.jpg Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate at Commons is under a free license Commons:File:Adelaide Crapsey, portrait.jpg If correct based on the dates (pre 1922). Then this non-free image is replaceable. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The file was moved from File:A crapsey.jpg to File:Adelaide Crapsey, poet.jpg by DragonflySixtyseven (talk · contribs) at 05:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons file Commons:File:Will.i.amS.png was ruled ineligible following a Deletion request. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete local copy in favour of Commons copy. Image licensing changed to PD-logo and replaced on the article with the Commons version. Salavat (talk) 03:56, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 12#File:Our_favourite_shop_side_1.jpg))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete czar 18:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed critically. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:05, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete—see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nghwaya czar 18:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic image, deleted from commons. Cordless Larry #talk# 19:52, 18 November 2016 #UTC#

Consider changing the license unless there is a proof of a breach of the license. Nghwaya —Preceding undated comment added 13:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's nothing to do with the licence. A calendar with the slogans "Save the elephant" and "AIDs kill [sic] take care" has no encyclopedic value. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:46, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:CalRipken MP.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

CV Chx1115 (talk) 21:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 January 12#File:WXIX_News_1993.png))

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

November 18

File:Samsung Series 4 "50 PDP.JPG

File:King's Speech soundtrack.jpg

File:Affiche Internationale juane The King's Speech.jpg

File:Argo soundtrack.jpg

File:Hobbit2-soundtrack special.jpg

File:The Hobbit - The Battle of The Five Armies OST(Special Edition).jpg

File:Blade Runner Spinners.png

File:Brideoffrankenstein.jpg

File:Henry cavill man of steel.jpg

File:Danmarks Tekniske Universitet (logo).svg

Towamencin Township school logos

File:UWP example.png

File:Zapier Logo.png

File:Woo Pak Foo.jpg

File:Adelaide Crapsey, poet.jpg

File:Willpower insignia.png

File:Our favourite shop side 1.jpg

File:VA PEACE-WarLP back.jpeg

File:VUgandaGregCalL2.PNG

File:CalRipken MP.png

File:WXIX News 1993.png